[c-nsp] Cisco IOS/XE :: H-QoS for Multi-VRF / Sub-interface setup

[eyeballi77]

Thanks Brian for your response,

I have also looked into this also under our previous topic (
http://goo.gl/wmVffr), but I believe this approach shares the default class
through the fragment key word (if I understand it correctly).

The key point that I need input on is the ability to use qos-groups across
the multiple VRF's to shape the common traffic classes to a single
bandwidth.



On 24 June 2016 at 12:23, Brian Turnbow <b.turnbow at twt.it> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> try taking a look at service-fragment.
> It will work on subinterfaces, but I'm not sure about using it with
> different vrfs.....
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_mqc/configuration/xe-
> 3s/qos-mqc-xe-3s-book/qos-agg.html
>
>
> Brian
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > eyeballi77
> > Sent: venerdě 24 giugno 2016 10:45
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS/XE :: H-QoS for Multi-VRF / Sub-interface
> setup
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Can you help clarify for me on my understanding of the above.  I have a
> > 10Mb cct and want share the overall bandwidth across all VRF's/sub-
> > interfaces as opposed to dedicating specific chunks of bandwidth to
> specific
> > VRF/interfaces.
> >
> > By placing the parent policy on the physical interface with multiple
> child
> > policies relating to each of the VRF's.
> >
> > My thinking being that traffic will be classified from each vrf to a
> qos-group
> > and the child policies with match/police/shape based on the qos-groups.
> >
> > Appreciate any guidance/input
> >
> > Neil
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>