[c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920

Nick Cutting ncutting at edgetg.co.uk
Thu Mar 31 04:49:05 EDT 2016


We bought a few 4451's but that was before the 4431 came out.

For edge gigabit internet devices (BGP default route only) , when NOT using ASR1k,  we now use ISR4431/K9 + 1 gig throughput  license
They are one U, unlike 4451 which is 2U and somehow filled with bricks



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: 31 March 2016 07:29
To: Mark Tinka
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:09:16AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Not sure about pricing for the ISR, but the ASR920 will do what you want.

Pricing for the ASR920 is complicated due to hardware/software licenses and models, but base list price of the ISR4451 is about 3x the base list price of ASR920-12CZ.  So if ASR920 works for the requirements, it seems to be "the!" platform of choice.

(Still waiting for someone to explain to me how control-plane protection works on ASR920... is it 6500-style CoPP, ASR9k-style LPTS, or "we have a fast CPU, we don't need this stuff!"-denial?)

gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list