[c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Mar 31 06:04:03 EDT 2016


Hi,

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:49:05AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote:
> We bought a few 4451's but that was before the 4431 came out.
> 
> For edge gigabit internet devices (BGP default route only) , when NOT using ASR1k,  we now use ISR4431/K9 + 1 gig throughput  license
> They are one U, unlike 4451 which is 2U and somehow filled with bricks

Did you not evaluate ASR920 at all ("1U, not very deep") or do you need
ISR features that the ASR920 doesn't have?

Just curious.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20160331/78115d7d/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list