[c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920

Nick Cutting ncutting at edgetg.co.uk
Thu Mar 31 07:49:53 EDT 2016

However we seriously considered 920 for internet edge with minimal BGP routes only - for that we had to go ASR1k to keep in-line with other offices, 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting
Sent: 31 March 2016 12:48
To: Gert Doering
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920

We/Clients needed netflow from the get-go, as far as I know - it's still not available on the 920 ;( Plus we use some VRF-lite + static VTI/DMVPN which I do not know if it is supported on the 920

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de]
Sent: 31 March 2016 11:04
To: Nick Cutting
Cc: Gert Doering; Mark Tinka; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920


On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:49:05AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote:
> We bought a few 4451's but that was before the 4431 came out.
> For edge gigabit internet devices (BGP default route only) , when NOT 
> using ASR1k,  we now use ISR4431/K9 + 1 gig throughput  license They 
> are one U, unlike 4451 which is 2U and somehow filled with bricks

Did you not evaluate ASR920 at all ("1U, not very deep") or do you need ISR features that the ASR920 doesn't have?

Just curious.

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list