[c-nsp] ASR9k Bundle QoS in 6.0.1

[Mark Tinka]

On 14/May/16 13:47, Saku Ytti wrote:

> You can do 'packet-via-dmem' capture in production for transit traffic
> without ill-effect. The TAC engineers note about flow based balancing
> is same for every vendor, only way to do it, without introducing
> reordering. If there is entropy, unfair balancing can be fixed by the
> solution mentioned earlier, your problem seemed indeed to be with
> platform somehow not seeing multiple flows.

I'll find some time to re-open the case and do the packet capture, thanks.

However, given how unpredictable flow-based load balancing can be,
policing across LAG's based on that load balancing scheme is not
reliable today.

I'm working on another solution.

Mark.