[c-nsp] EVC/BDI vs dot1q subint on ASR1K

[CiscoNSP List]

Hi Everyone,


Historically, we have used the old-style dot1q subints on 7200's, and then when we moved to the ASR1K, BDI had a bug with FNF, so we went with dot1q subints, purely for netflow support.....BDI/FNF Ive yet to test on our new batch of ASR1001X's, but do "most" use EVC/BDI vs dot1q subints....i.e. from a feature parity perspective, EVC/BDI *should* support all (and more) than dot1q subints?



Cheers.