[c-nsp] "safe harbor" - reliable statement about expected sw quality?

[Patrick M. Hausen]

Hi,

> Am 17.11.2016 um 11:26 schrieb Lukas Tribus <luky-37 at hotmail.com>:
>> Does the missing "star" imply I can expect less reliability
>> from SXJ10 compared to SXJ7?
> 
> No (and actually the "star" is on 15.1.2-SY9, which is the suggested
> IOS you should be running on new deployments).
> 
> Just because the latter has a certification while the former doesn't,
> doesn't imply the latter is more stable.
> 
> In fact SXJ7 has 4 publicly known vulnerabilities, so I would strongly
> suggest to run SXJ10 (if you have to stay on the SXJ train, that is).

Thanks. That explained it quite well.

I'm planning to stay on SXJ beacuse of the purported memory issues
with 15.x and full feeds.

Patrick
-- 
punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe
Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100
info at punkt.de       http://www.punkt.de
Gf: Jürgen Egeling      AG Mannheim 108285