[c-nsp] ASR1001-X etherchannel subinterfaces

[James Bensley]

On 10 October 2016 at 23:18, Chris Balmain
<Chris.Balmain at connectivityit.com.au> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We're currently evaluating ASR1001-X with XE 3.16.00S / 15.5(3)S running BRAS role "on a stick" using 2x10G in an LACP etherchannel.

Upgrade to 03.16.03a.S to fix lots of bugs (3.16.4aS is out now too!).

Also QoS over LAGs when running BRAS is gennerally a bad  feature set
for the ASR1000 series devices it seems. We hit too many bugs and have
multiple layer 3 links instead of bundled layer 2 links.


Cheers,
James.