[c-nsp] Does NCS behave like Nexus w/regard to vPC+VRRP active/active?

[adamv0025 at netconsultings.com]

Yup, using proprietary common brain was deemed as not an optimal solution to
the problem, hence why routers are rather using MC-LAG (multichassis LACP)
instead.

adam

netconsultings.com
::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry::

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Brian Turnbow
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:33 PM
> To: 'David Hubbard'; 'cisco-nsp'
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Does NCS behave like Nexus w/regard to vPC+VRRP
> active/active?
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> The ncs5501 does not support vpc nor any vss clustering  like
configuration
> afaik.
> 
> 
> Brian
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> > Of David Hubbard
> > Sent: giovedì 14 dicembre 2017 18:07
> > To: cisco-nsp
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Does NCS behave like Nexus w/regard to vPC+VRRP
> > active/active?
> >
> > Hey all, before I go too far down the configuration path, was curious
> > if anyone knows off hand if the NCS5500 line (5501SE with IOS XR
> > 6.2.25) behave like Nexus when you set up vPC + VRRP where data plane
> > is active/active for forwarding?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/