[c-nsp] Juniper MX240 & MX480
    Mark Tinka 
    mark.tinka at seacom.mu
       
    Wed Nov  1 05:09:17 EDT 2017
    
    
  
On 31/Oct/17 10:48, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Am I only one puzzled about MX204 port choice, 4xQSFP28 + 8xSFP+.
> Seems like it's positioned to datacenters facing upstream? I'd want
> 2xQSFP28 and maybe 36xSFP+ (oversub is fine), with attractive
> licensing using SFP+ as SFP only, to add L3 DFZ 1GE aggregation box to
> JNPR portfolio.
> I can't imagine rolling this would be expensive, call it MX202 o
> something. JNPR do me a solid.
Still not exactly the Metro-E solution we've been longing for from
Juniper, but I do see a use-case where customers in the Metro want
10Gbps ports.
But that will be the exception, and not the rule. At least for us.
Mark.
    
    
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list