[c-nsp] Leaked Video or Not (Linux and Cisco for internal Sales folks)
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Jun 22 11:23:24 EDT 2018
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:20:55AM -0700, Tails Pipes wrote:
> Thats the problem they are engaging with. Nearly everyone is doing better,
> faster, easier, more reliable networking that Cisco. Most often, at a
> cheaper price too.
Not exactly sure what you're talking about. Cisco builds many products,
some of them are indeed not very reliable, and others are definitely
more expensive :-) - but to claim "nearly everyone is doing better, faster,
more reliable" is so totally off-base that you really need to do some
solid reading before going on with that rant.
The "networking space" is very vast - from boxes that have a few times
100 Mbit and full software routing to boxes that use broadcom chips
for "fast and cheap" 40x 10Gbit ports but limited feature sets (<- this
is dictated by the hardware, the OS used on top can not change it),
to "flexible, fast, and insanely expensive" boxes with many times 100Gbit/s
support for >2 Million routing table entries, etc.
Depending on your needs, an APU2 with Linux might be the right answer,
or a Cisco ASR9900 or Juniper MX2020, filling a whole rack and costing
multiple million US$... (and no, you won't be able to do that with
Linux or any other generic OS without heavy hardware support)
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20180622/7bc7c302/attachment.sig>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list