[c-nsp] l2tpv3 Issues on 6800/3800
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Sep 28 05:59:41 EDT 2018
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 08:01:22AM +0000, Harivishnu Abhilash wrote:
> Thanks for the response. But we were quite surprised as the 6800 was
> doing EoMPLS perfectly.
It's based on 6500 architecture, which has done MPLS and EoMPLS (and,
depending on Supervisor generation, also VPLS) "since ever" (sup720 days).
L2TPv3 is a different protocol, and the old hardware never had support for
it - and you can't just add it by means of software upgrade.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20180928/1f18bde2/attachment.sig>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list