[c-nsp] l2tpv3 Issues on 6800/3800

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Sep 28 05:59:41 EDT 2018


Hi,

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 08:01:22AM +0000, Harivishnu Abhilash wrote:
> Thanks for the response. But we were quite surprised as the 6800 was 
> doing EoMPLS perfectly. 

It's based on 6500 architecture, which has done MPLS and EoMPLS (and,
depending on Supervisor generation, also VPLS)  "since ever" (sup720 days).  

L2TPv3 is a different protocol, and the old hardware never had support for 
it - and you can't just add it by means of software upgrade.

gert
-- 
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20180928/1f18bde2/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list