[c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP domains

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Apr 30 08:51:37 EDT 2019



On 29/Apr/19 15:53, Robert Raszuk wrote:

> Even better to get rid of transport MPLS all together ... There is nothing
> in LDP MPLS which would be of any value as compared with basic IP UDP
> encap. Of course you can still run all of your L3VPNs or EVPNs if you wish
> so over IP transport.

Do you have a practical example of anyone doing this as a replacement
for MPLS-based encapsulation?

Mark.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list