[c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP domains

[Robert Raszuk]

Yes Mark ... numerous both in WAN and DC space.

In fact entire Contrail was based on L3VPN over UDP/IP too. So is EVPN in
number of real life deployments.

All vendors support it too, but their marketing is scared that they will
loose $$$ as it will open much easier market penetration by new vendors so
they like to keep you tight to LDP :)

Best,
R.


On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:56 PM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

>
>
> On 29/Apr/19 15:53, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
> > Even better to get rid of transport MPLS all together ... There is
> nothing
> > in LDP MPLS which would be of any value as compared with basic IP UDP
> > encap. Of course you can still run all of your L3VPNs or EVPNs if you
> wish
> > so over IP transport.
>
> Do you have a practical example of anyone doing this as a replacement
> for MPLS-based encapsulation?
>
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>