[c-nsp] XRv (eve-ng)

[Aaron]

Is that XRv or XRv9K?
XRv was great as it didn't require as many resources.

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:28 AM Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:

> Have you all been able to use EVE-NG ?  My gosh, what an awesome emulator.
>
>
>
> I have eve-ng running…
>
>
>
> XRv
>
> vMX
>
> vQFX
>
>
>
> (this might end up being a much larger topic)  BTW, Why does Juniper do
> what appears to be such a better job with CP/FP (control plane/forwarding
> plane) separation ?  I’m speaking about XR and Junos and also how clean
> Junos vMX seems to be done as I work with it in EVE-NG when compared to XRv.
>
>
>
> XRv is still one node.
>
>
>
> vMX is 2 nodes… VCP and VFP.
>
>
>
> Also, in XRv I can’t add martini-type access pw’s into an l2vpn nor can I
> add routing on a BVI….. but, conversely I can do all those things in vMX
>
>
>
> As nice as XR(v) is, it still seems to be playing catch-up to (v)MX.  Is
> this true in your mind ?
>
>
>
> Stepping away from the eve-ng emulator for a moment, over the years of
> working with XR I was so pleased with how it improved upon classic IOS….
> But then I began working with Junos a few years ago, and wow, it seemed to
> take routing os to a whole other level than XR did… again, this could be in
> my head, but curious what others think, IF, you have actually done enough
> work on both platforms to know enough to speak to it.
>
>
>
> -Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>