[c-nsp] BGP - advertising default route to Branch offices

Yham yhameed81 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 12 22:00:58 EDT 2020


Thanks Mike for the input.

Its bgp end to end (branch switches <-bgp-> core switches <-bgp-> edge
devices). branch switches dual home to two core switches.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:31 PM Mike <mike+lists at yourtownonline.com> wrote:

> On 8/12/20 5:20 PM, Yham wrote:
> > Hello Gentlemen,
> > I have 100+ branch offices peering BGP with Core and I need to advertise
> > the default route (only) to them. Core switches are receiving the default
> > route via eBGP from upstream devices. I can think of two ways to
> advertise
> > the default route as follows
> >
> > 1- advertise/pass on the default route that core switches receive from
> > upstream edge devices. Along with that add a static default route
> pointing
> > to null0 with higher administrative distance and redistribute into BGP.
> > that way if for any reason upstream edge devices stop advertising the
> > default route, the static default route will kick in.
> > 2 - default-originate command under every BGP neighborship. I have 100+
> > neighbors so configure this command for all.
> >
> > Can anyone please tell which is considered a best practice when it comes
> to
> > the advertising default route? If any vendor documentation addresses
> this,
> > please feel free to share.
> >
> Hello
>
> This really sounds like OSPF may have been a better choice, IMHO.
>
> Do you have more than one link back to core from each site? If not, then
> why not just stick with/use a static default? Easier to configure and
> nearly goof-proof.
>
> Otherwise, I would think that 'default-originate' would be the better
> choice under each neighborship.
>
> Mike-
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list