[c-nsp] ASR920 LACP and xconnect
cnsp at marenda.net
cnsp at marenda.net
Fri Aug 21 13:49:31 EDT 2020
Sorry, i think the behaviour is explainable.
You have (I think, on both sides equivalent config)
Two Gig Ports bundled with LACP to that prot-channel.
For that, the switch speak link-local pakets to the neighbor device.
Now , yo build that xconnect and ask to forward link-local pakets to the
remote.
OK, device does this.
Recieving device does some fancy load blancing an therfor, LACP starts to
fail since .
Either let the local switch handle the LACP Bundle and do not forward the
LACP packets
Thru that xconnect,
or build _two_ transparent xconnects/Eline/Epipe servicesso A-1 sees B-Side
1 and A-2 sees B-2
and the LACP Pakets from A1 and A2 do not go all to B1 or mixed/loadbalaced
to B1 and B2 (end vice-versa).
and _do_not_ bundle locally.
Just my 0.01 $
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Kind regards
Veuillez agréer mes salutations distinguées
Met vriendelijke groet
Jürgen Marenda.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
<mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> > Im Auftrag von James
> Bensley
> Gesendet: Freitag, 21. August 2020 16:38
> An: Eric Van Tol <eric at atlantech.net <mailto:eric at atlantech.net> >;
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Betreff: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 LACP and xconnect
>
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 19:16, Eric Van Tol <eric at atlantech.net
<mailto:eric at atlantech.net> > wrote:
> > Interface configs:
> >
> > interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
> > mtu 1600
> > no ip address
> > load-interval 30
> > negotiation auto
> > channel-group 1 mode active
> > !
> >
> > interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
> > mtu 1600
> > no ip address
> > load-interval 30
> > negotiation auto
> > channel-group 1 mode active
> > !
> > interface Port-channel1
> > mtu 1600
> > no ip address
> > load-interval 30
> > negotiation auto
> > no keepalive
> > service instance 1 ethernet
> > encapsulation default
> > l2protocol peer lacp
> > xconnect x.x.x.x 1234 encapsulation mpls pw-class Raw-Mode-VC5
> > mtu 1600
>
> What happens if you change each interface to be "channel-group 1 mode on"
> and remove "l2protocol peer lacp" to disable LACP and remove it from the
> equation?
>
> Cheers,
> James.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list