[c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes

[Jason Lixfeld]

> On Jul 8, 2020, at 9:14 PM, Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net> wrote:
> 
> Vikas,
> 
> First of all, NCS 540 ACC-SYS has 16GB of RAM.

… but only 8GB available to the RP.

RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ncs540-7.lab#show memory summary
Wed Jul  8 21:19:33.842 EDT

node:      node0_RP0_CPU0
------------------------------------------------------------------

 Physical Memory: 8192M total (5333M available)
 Application Memory : 8192M (5333M available)
 Image: 4M (bootram: 0M)
 Reserved: 0M, IOMem: 0M, flashfsys: 0M
 Total shared window: 410M

RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ncs540-7.lab#show platform
Wed Jul  8 21:20:04.260 EDT
Node              Type                       State             Config state
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0/RP0/CPU0        N540-ACC-SYS(Active)       IOS XR RUN        NSHUT
0/RP0/NPU0        Slice                      UP
0/FT0             N540-FAN                   OPERATIONAL       NSHUT
0/FT1             N540-FAN                   OPERATIONAL       NSHUT
0/FT2             N540-FAN                   OPERATIONAL       NSHUT
0/FT3             N540-FAN                   OPERATIONAL       NSHUT
0/PM0             N540-PWR400-D              OPERATIONAL       NSHUT
0/PM1             N540-PWR400-D              FAILED            NSHUT
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ncs540-7.lab#

> 
> For NCS 540, slide 43:
> https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKSPG-2159.pdf <https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKSPG-2159.pdf>
> 
> Essentially, around 380k depending on prefix distribution.
> 
> For ASR 1002-HX it’s here:
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html#PerformanceandScaling <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html#PerformanceandScaling>
> 
> Please use your favorite search engine first in future.
> 
> — 
> ./
> 
>> On 9 Jul 2020, at 02:48, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com <mailto:vikassharmas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Many thanks Jason for your quick response.
>> 
>> If possible please also confirm the rib/fib limits of ASR1002-HX.
>> 
>> I have two choices to be used as IGW, ASR1002-HX or C 540 X and I want to
>> choose the best of the two options.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Vikas
>> 
>> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 12:52 am Jason Lixfeld, <jason at lixfeld.ca <mailto:jason at lixfeld.ca>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I don’t know the exact RIB scale, if there is one, short of what available
>>> memory will hold.  That said, it’s got 8GB of memory, and I’ve seen 1.7M+
>>> BGP prefixes with the BGP process consuming about 1.9GB of memory.
>>> 
>>> It won’t hold a full table in FIB. 350K max, protocol independent,
>>> depending on the prefix size.
>>> 
>>> SRD is implemented using table-policy.
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 8, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com <mailto:vikassharmas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear,
>>>> 
>>>> Can someone please confirm how many routes are supported in above model
>>> in
>>>> both rib and fib?
>>>> 
>>>> Also, I am not able to find table-map command for this router.
>>>> 
>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>>    Vikas
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>> 
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>