[c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes

[Vikas Sharma]

Dear Luka,

Thanks for your revert. I have checked all ciscolive presentation before I
have shooted question to the forum. I understand, LPM and LEM along with
iTCAM support on C 540 does not exceed 400k but I was not getting details
on rib/fib on ASR 1002-HX, in case you have found, please share with me.

Also, processing power of ASR vs C 540 is very different, one with quard
core 1.2 GHz and another with 2.5 GHz, so I  was also wondering if BGP
scanner process will be good with which. If 540 can take care of scanning
process!!

Also internet does not inform about table-map (atleast, I couldn't find),
on C 540, many thanks to Jason for details provided.

Anyway, many thanks for the kind revert.

Regards,
Vikas

On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 6:44 am Łukasz Bromirski, <lukasz at bromirski.net> wrote:

> Vikas,
>
> First of all, NCS 540 ACC-SYS has 16GB of RAM.
>
> For NCS 540, slide 43:
>
> https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKSPG-2159.pdf
>
> Essentially, around 380k depending on prefix distribution.
>
> For ASR 1002-HX it’s here:
>
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html#PerformanceandScaling
>
> Please use your favorite search engine first in future.
>
> —
> ./
>
> On 9 Jul 2020, at 02:48, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Many thanks Jason for your quick response.
>
> If possible please also confirm the rib/fib limits of ASR1002-HX.
>
> I have two choices to be used as IGW, ASR1002-HX or C 540 X and I want to
> choose the best of the two options.
>
> Regards,
> Vikas
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 12:52 am Jason Lixfeld, <jason at lixfeld.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don’t know the exact RIB scale, if there is one, short of what available
> memory will hold.  That said, it’s got 8GB of memory, and I’ve seen 1.7M+
> BGP prefixes with the BGP process consuming about 1.9GB of memory.
>
> It won’t hold a full table in FIB. 350K max, protocol independent,
> depending on the prefix size.
>
> SRD is implemented using table-policy.
>
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear,
>
> Can someone please confirm how many routes are supported in above model
>
> in
>
> both rib and fib?
>
> Also, I am not able to find table-map command for this router.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Regards,
>
>    Vikas
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>