[c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes

[Vikas Sharma]

Slight modification, I am looking for fib for ASR 1002-HX , RIB is
available.

Regards,
Vikas

On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 7:04 am Vikas Sharma, <vikassharmas at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Luka,
>
> Thanks for your revert. I have checked all ciscolive presentation before I
> have shooted question to the forum. I understand, LPM and LEM along with
> iTCAM support on C 540 does not exceed 400k but I was not getting details
> on rib/fib on ASR 1002-HX, in case you have found, please share with me.
>
> Also, processing power of ASR vs C 540 is very different, one with quard
> core 1.2 GHz and another with 2.5 GHz, so I  was also wondering if BGP
> scanner process will be good with which. If 540 can take care of scanning
> process!!
>
> Also internet does not inform about table-map (atleast, I couldn't find),
> on C 540, many thanks to Jason for details provided.
>
> Anyway, many thanks for the kind revert.
>
> Regards,
> Vikas
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 6:44 am Łukasz Bromirski, <lukasz at bromirski.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Vikas,
>>
>> First of all, NCS 540 ACC-SYS has 16GB of RAM.
>>
>> For NCS 540, slide 43:
>>
>> https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKSPG-2159.pdf
>>
>> Essentially, around 380k depending on prefix distribution.
>>
>> For ASR 1002-HX it’s here:
>>
>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html#PerformanceandScaling
>>
>> Please use your favorite search engine first in future.
>>
>> —
>> ./
>>
>> On 9 Jul 2020, at 02:48, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Many thanks Jason for your quick response.
>>
>> If possible please also confirm the rib/fib limits of ASR1002-HX.
>>
>> I have two choices to be used as IGW, ASR1002-HX or C 540 X and I want to
>> choose the best of the two options.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vikas
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Jul, 2020, 12:52 am Jason Lixfeld, <jason at lixfeld.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don’t know the exact RIB scale, if there is one, short of what available
>> memory will hold.  That said, it’s got 8GB of memory, and I’ve seen 1.7M+
>> BGP prefixes with the BGP process consuming about 1.9GB of memory.
>>
>> It won’t hold a full table in FIB. 350K max, protocol independent,
>> depending on the prefix size.
>>
>> SRD is implemented using table-policy.
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Vikas Sharma <vikassharmas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear,
>>
>> Can someone please confirm how many routes are supported in above model
>>
>> in
>>
>> both rib and fib?
>>
>> Also, I am not able to find table-map command for this router.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Vikas
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>