[c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:53:49PM -0400, Phil Bedard wrote:
> >    The CRS made a lot of sense because we had a need for plenty of
> >    non-Ethernet links, and both the MX and ASR9000 were too expensive on a
> >    per-slot basis.
> 
> Fair enough.   Every vendor has gone through their own pain with
> the older midplane systems in having to swap out chassis multiple
> times to get to higher speeds. Thankfully with the newer fabric
> designs we've eliminated most of that.

But that's actually one of the things that alienates the "not megacarrier"
customers.  There's perfectly working routers, they fall out of love,
new features are not added anymore, and you're expected to buy 32x400G
things when all you need are like "16x 10G".

gert
-- 
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20200717/e81413ee/attachment.sig>