[c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes

[Mark Tinka]

On 17/Jul/20 08:17, Gert Doering wrote:

> But that's actually one of the things that alienates the "not megacarrier"
> customers.  There's perfectly working routers, they fall out of love,
> new features are not added anymore, and you're expected to buy 32x400G
> things when all you need are like "16x 10G".

I think the MX has shown how this can be done, reasonably well, and
still continue to be the pick of the field.

The MX104 was the only time I can fault Juniper, but otherwise, what
they've done with the MX is nothing short of exemplary.

I have no doubt the MX480's I bought in 2014 will still be with us for
another 6 years, at least. Which is why I have no problem investing in
the MX10003 for dedicated 100Gbps edge customers.

Fancy slides and coining catchy terms is no longer a path into our
network. Service provider networks are not that complicated, or complex.
Get back to your roots, and let's not make it a whole song & dance

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20200717/68eca802/attachment.sig>