[c-nsp] NAT on ASR920 Everest

[Scott Miller]

Ouch ... I have a number of ASR-920-12CZ-A ... and was trying to re-utilize
my existing inventory.

Back to the storage room we go.

Thanks.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:24 PM Shawn L <shawn at rmrf.us> wrote:

> I remember reading somewhere that NAT wsan't supported on the 920 series.
> Though I did find this
>
>
> It appears that NAT is only supported on the 12SZ-IM
>
> https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/nat-on-cisco-asr920/td-p/3023788
>
> With that being said, I haven't tried it on any of the ASR920s that we've
> purchased
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:13 PM Scott Miller <fordlove at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all, I'm trying to configure NAT on an ASR920
>> running 16.06.05a [Everest]
>> GW-01#show license
>> Index 1 Feature: advancedmetroipaccess
>>         Period left: Life time
>>         License Type: Permanent
>>         License State: Active, In Use
>>         License Count: Non-Counted
>>         License Priority: Medium
>>
>> Docs say it should be configurable.
>>
>>
>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_nat/configuration/xe-16-6/nat-xe-16-6-book.pdf
>>
>> However, none of the standard NAT commands are available.
>> Example:ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
>> overload (access-list is already configured)
>>
>> "nat" is not a subcommand of "ip" and I get an error:
>> GW-01(config)#ip nat inside source list 150 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
>> overload
>>                  ^
>> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
>>
>> GW-01(config)#
>>
>> Even under the interface, the ip nat inside or ip nat outside is not a
>> valid command.
>>
>> LTE-NAT-HOC-GW-01(config)#ip ?
>> Global IP configuration subcommands:
>> ...
>> ...
>>   multicast             Global IP Multicast Commands
>>   multicast-routing     Enable IP multicast forwarding
>>   name-server           Specify address of name server to use
>>   nbar                  NBAR - Network Based Application Recognition
>>   options               IP Options treatment
>> ...
>> ...
>>
>> Anyone know if maybe it's a license level and I need to drop
>> to metroipaccess or lower?  Or is EVEREST not correctly supported?
>>
>> Reaching out in case anyone has run into this before.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>