[c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

[Eugene Grosbein]

28.09.2020 15:20, cnsp at marenda.net wrote:
> 
> I would avoid using gig 0/3 and would not bundle it with gig0/[012] . 
> 
> Gig0/0 0/1 0/2 are marvel SOCs build-in Ports 
> while Gig0/3 together with the Mangement "Fas"0/0 are on a separate intel
> ethernetcontrollerchip 
> (with gig+(only)fas they try tonot oversubscribe the internal pci bus ) 

We do not use FastEthernet0/0 at all (shut down), instead a console port is connected to a console server.

I already run one of 7201 with a couple of 2x1G port-channels mostly for redundancy as it proccesses less than 100Mbps,
no problems observed. Will see how it goes with more loaded box.