[c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

[Drew Weaver]

Hi Tim, 

I replied off-list with additional details but I wanted to reply on list to answer your specific questions:

I copied the strict policy and then edited it with these classes at the top:

policy-map type control-plane Test6
  class custom-copp-system-p-bgp-allow
    police cir 19000 pps bc 128 packets conform transmit violate drop
  class custom-copp-system-p-bgp-deny
    police cir 0 pps bc 1 packets conform transmit violate drop 
    
These are the configured class-maps:

Class-map type control-plane match-any custom-copp-system-p-bgp-allow
      match access-group name custom-copp-system-p-acl-bgp-allow
Class-map type control-plane match-any custom-copp-system-p-bgp-deny
      match access-group name custom-copp-system-p-acl-bgp-deny

These are the configured ACLs:

IP access list custom-copp-system-p-acl-bgp-allow
        3 permit tcp 192.168.1.2/32 gt 1023 any eq bgp 
        4 permit tcp 192.168.1.2/32 eq bgp any gt 1023 

IP access list custom-copp-system-p-acl-bgp-deny
        1 permit tcp any any eq bgp 
        10 permit tcp any gt 1023 any eq bgp 
        20 permit tcp any eq bgp any gt 1023
  
control-plane
  service-policy input Test6

The primary difference that I notice between the two configurations is that your allow is set to cos 7 and on mine it is not specified and yours is policing on bps and mine is policing on pps. (I am pretty certain that throughout the process I have tried it both ways).

I find it a bit hard to follow that on this platform there is no way to write "just block everything that matches this class" you still have to give it a "burst" [which I obviously don't want] I understand that behind the scenes the control plane is supposed to "do the right thing" but it is just difficult to understand that from reading it.

With this configuration applied:

1) Any host that NMAPs the device sees 179 open.
2) BGP sessions establish (if configured on the Nexus) for hosts that are not 192.168.1.2/32

Is there any way to find out what class traffic from a specific SRC IP or to a specific port is getting caught at in a CoPP policy?

I suspect that the TCP/179 traffic is just bypassing these classes altogether and most likely are getting handled further down in the CoPP policy but I haven't been able to prove that.

Thanks so much.
-Drew




-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) <tstevens at cisco.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 5:31 PM
To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>; 'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net' <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: RE: Nexus Architecture question

Hi Drew, 

In answer to your question about BGP, the BGP process runs only on the supervisor engine, it does not run on the linecards or anywhere else. It's a single process, not a per-interface process or anything like that.

Curious how exactly you are configuring CoPP to filter this? With default CoPP, I get an "open/tcpwrapped" (green) response on TCP 179; I was able to get a "filtered" (red) response by adding a CoPP class that matches on BGP and polices to a CIR of 0. I preceeded that class with a class that matches on a specific neighborship - that BGP neighborship is successfully established while nmap still returns as filtered from my host.

ip access-list allow-bgp
  10 permit tcp 10.1.1.1/32 gt 1023 10.1.1.2/32 eq bgp
  20 permit tcp 10.1.1.2/32 eq bgp 10.1.1.1/32 gt 1023 ip access-list drop-bgp
  10 permit tcp any any eq bgp
  20 permit tcp any eq bgp any
!
class-map type control-plane match-any allow-bgp
  match access-group name allow-bgp
class-map type control-plane match-any drop-bgp
  match access-group name drop-bgp
!
policy-map type control-plane test-copp-policy-strict
  class allow-bgp
    set cos 7
    police cir 36000 kbps bc 1280000 bytes conform transmit violate drop
  class drop-bgp
    police cir 0 bps bc 32000 bytes conform transmit violate drop


Hope that helps,
Tim



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 6:41 AM
To: 'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net' <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

Has anyone seen a document from Cisco that shows where various processes running on various Nexus switches actually run from?

For example on a 9508 the nxapi runs in a Linux VM and in order to secure it you have to drop into the VM and use iptables.

I am trying to figure out where the BGP process lives (for lack of a better word). Does it run on the line cards? In the control plane? Both? Does it vary depending on which model and which line cards?

The reason I am asking is because I've noticed that no matter what I do I cannot seem to "close" the BGP port by using CoPP.

It always shows up as being open when doing a port scan against the system using NMAP. I know that the switch should not establish a connection with random hosts but I really am getting hung up on it being 'scannable'/visible at all.


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dnsp&d=DwIFAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=OPufM5oSy-PFpzfoijO_w76wskMALE1o4LtA3tMGmuw&m=YtllAoz3HDjZVAXXoCsZK6ipRakorNNjjRatpXyS2WI&s=4ERFXSbBNsxA_cctrBhoVJkOGZGvRGL-K6poiFabwpE&e=
archive at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__puck.nether.net_pipermail_cisco-2Dnsp_&d=DwIFAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=OPufM5oSy-PFpzfoijO_w76wskMALE1o4LtA3tMGmuw&m=YtllAoz3HDjZVAXXoCsZK6ipRakorNNjjRatpXyS2WI&s=9jw1ySSVK0D_6O6lG4HjPujMRWV8aM028yprf0soAJo&e=