[cisco-voip] IPCC Express CTI numbering practice

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

We put the DNs right into our 5 digit dial plan, that way, we would have no worry about overlapping. They're segregated so only the people/applications that need to dial them can dial them, but once assigned, the DN is not used again.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Voll, Scott 
  To: medley at mac.com ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:08 PM
  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express CTI numbering practice


  I use the DID for the Route Point and I just use an unused area for CTI
  Ports.

  For instance if my DIDs were 3xxx then I would use a range like 6xxx.

  I have no idea if this is best practice, but it's what I've done.

  Scott

  -----Original Message-----
  From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
  [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Medley
  Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:34 AM
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express CTI numbering practice

  Can anyone share their numbering scheme for CTI Route points and CTI
  ports
  in regards to IPCC Express?

  I have played around with a few different numbering schemes and was just
  curious what out people have come up with.

  Tim Medley 




  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20041012/0385c975/attachment.html