[cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Thu Apr 7 12:22:53 EDT 2005


it's a 685MB file which takes a while to decompress. There was one reboot almost immediately after the install started, then i think only one more after the install was done. I can't remember the time it took, i left the box for a while.

Make sure you have ample free space, at least 4GB. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Voll, Scott 
  To: Brad Waldbauer ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 12:21 PM
  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3


  How long was the .3 upgrade from the .2?  how many reboots?


  -----Original Message-----
  From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
  [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brad Waldbauer
  Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:17 AM
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Subject: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

  I just did a new install to 4.1.2 and then to .3 and it went fine.  I
  just hit the exe and away it went. I'm just starting to program my
  pieces and I haven't had any problems.... yet.  LOL.

  Brad
  ISC - Information Systems Consulting

  -----Original Message-----
  From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
  [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
  cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
  Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 06:35 AM
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33

  Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
  cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

  You can reach the person managing the list at
  cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
  than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


  Today's Topics:

     1. 4.1.2 to 3 (Voll, Scott)
     2. can not upgrade lic on cue  (james)
     3. Re: AS5400-HPX platform restriction (Jon Lewis)
     4. install ccm 4.12 erroe ( ??? )
     5. IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in queue problem
        (Gawie Herholdt (GSP))
     6. : Question about Java programming (Aurelien FACHAUX)
     7. RE: 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and ATAfax
        Passthrough (Boda Gy?rgy)
     8. Phone stuck in Forward.. (Tamer Mohamed Bayomy)
     9. Berbee InformaCast (Eric McKinney)


  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  Message: 1
  Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:51:12 -0700
  From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
  Subject: [cisco-voip] 4.1.2 to 3
  To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  Message-ID: <D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01511C20 at VISHNU.wesd.org>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

  Anyone upgrade from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3 yet?  The PDF attached is really
  designed for 4.0 and 3.3 to 4.1 so I'm looking for a better doc.  Do I
  just need to install it like a SR?

  Thanks for any input.

  Scott




  ------------------------------

  Message: 2
  Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:21:33 -0400
  From: "james" <jgrace at digitelusa.net>
  Subject: [cisco-voip] can not upgrade lic on cue 
  To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  Message-ID: <000201c53afc$8e6a2de0$320d020a at digitelcorp.com>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

  I having a problem with upgrading the lic pkg on my cue nm .  i was fine
  with the software upgrade. and unity is working at this time.  but cue
  will not take the lic pkg file.  the ftp transfer goes fine and
  completes. i reload and nothing, it still have the same 12 mailboxs.  im
  trying to up grade to a 100mb pkg.  i call tac in on it and ive had no
  luck....

  James Grace 
  System Engineer /Professional Srvc.
  MCSE MCSA MCDBA CCNA CCNP CQS

  -------------- next part --------------
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050406/96ffc1
  38/attachment-0001.html

  ------------------------------

  Message: 3
  Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:12:18 -0400 (EDT)
  From: Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org>
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] AS5400-HPX platform restriction
  To: Ryan Fields <jryan.fields at gmail.com>
  Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504062305030.12430 at web1.mmaero.com>
  Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

  On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Ryan Fields wrote:

  > We are currently running voip service using an AS5400-HPX
  > and would like to have off-ramp faxing as well.  I did a couple
  > of tries of having both voice calls and off-ramp process at the
  > same time.  So far its working fine but to be on the safe side
  > and not degrade its performance, I'd like to find its platform
  > restrictions. How can I verify the maximum simultaneous

  AFAIK, cisco does not publicly release such specs.  I had a customer
  trying to do fax broadcasting with a AS5400-HPX about year and a half
  ago.
  You might find something in the cisco-nas archive around Aug 2003...but
  off the top of my head, I think we got up to somewhere around 150
  simultaneous outgoing faxes, but that was with the box doing absolutely
  nothing else (other than the occasional crash), dedicating all its CPU
  to
  faxing.  I wouldn't expect it to do reasonable VOIP quality with
  anywhere
  near that number of faxes going on at the same time.

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jon Lewis                   |  I route
   Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
   Atlantic Net                |
  _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


  ------------------------------

  Message: 4
  Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:59:36 +0800 (CST)
  From: " ??? " <jianghb at netease.com>
  Subject: [cisco-voip] install ccm 4.12 erroe
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Message-ID: <4254CC43.000019.10977 at m217.mail.netease.com>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"

  04/08/2005 14:13:02.326 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall iuRunCommand:
  szCmd_ = "C:\utils\shutdown.exe" /L /R /Y /T:0 
  04/08/2005 14:13:02.876 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall CreateProcess:
  Error: 3: The system cannot find the path specified. 

  04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize Did not find
  file: "C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1.CCM\LOCALS~1\CCMServices.ctl" 
  04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize FindFirstFile:
  Error: 2: The system cannot find the file specified. 

  WHO???




  ------------------------------

  Message: 5
  Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:17:42 +0200
  From: "Gawie Herholdt \(GSP\)" <herholgs at telkom.co.za>
  Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in queue problem
  To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  Message-ID:

  <4561B54D504B79499D37BB32C86A67FE01C75411 at CNTRRA20-XCS00.telkom.co.za>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


  Hi



  I have a problem with a 3.1(2) IPCC Express system where 1 call is
  stuck in the queue for more than 3 hours now. The system works fine -
  all incoming calls are being queued / de-queued but just this one call
  is stuck in the queue. Is there a way to clear this call without
  restarting the engine? I have about 6 call center groups on there and
  do not want to affect all of them.



  Thanks

  Gawie







  Thanks and regards,

  Gawie Herholdt

  Snr Network Specialist, CCIE 7668 (R&S)

  Telkom SA (Pty) Ltd

  27-84-607-7371 (Mobile)

  27-12-680-7991 (IP Phone)

  27-12-680-0028 (Fax)





  ==================================================================
  This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
  e-mail legal notice available at
  http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
  -------------- next part --------------
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/309e42
  cb/attachment-0001.html

  ------------------------------

  Message: 6
  Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:19:48 +0200
  From: "Aurelien FACHAUX" <aurelienfachaux at hotmail.com>
  Subject: [cisco-voip] : Question about Java programming
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Message-ID: <BAY106-F13A7D90921846C9D7934C2A23E0 at phx.gbl>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed

  Hi everybody,

  I have a real problem with the CISCOIPPHONESTATUS AXL tag... In fact, I
  want 
  to know if it exists a way to use it with Java in order to implement an 
  interface with JTAPI...

  I need to generate a call and to display caller informations on IP PHONE

  screen.

  If you have some sourcecode or advice, don't hesitate ton contact me.

  Best regards.

  Aur?lien.

  _________________________________________________________________
  Ne cherchez plus, trouvez ! Avec le nouveau MSN Search. 
  http://search.msn.fr/



  ------------------------------

  Message: 7
  Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:41:51 +0200
  From: Boda Gy?rgy <gyorgy.boda at nextiraone.hu>
  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and
  ATAfax Passthrough
  To: "Andre Beck" <cisco-voip at ibh.net>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  Message-ID:

  <F3CFD039AAEB4244B1FE1F48B2821A16116B3D at aebserver01.alcatel-ebs.intra>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

  ATA to GK registration:

  configure via ATA's web page
  GK= 21.3.3.3
  GKID=<zone name>
  AutMethod = 0x00000004
  PWD0 = 1#
  AudioMode=0x00150015 for fax pass thru
  [even though you will see stars, just type 1# in this field]
  UID0 = 3003 <DN>
  LBR = 3 for G729

  Regs,

  Gy?rgy Boda

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Andre Beck [mailto:cisco-voip at ibh.net] 
  Sent: 2005. ?prilis 6. 18:16
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and
  ATAfax Passthrough

  On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:43:09PM +0200, Lasse Christiansen wrote:
  > 
  > I've really been confused as to Cisco's recommendations on the ATA. 
  > I've seen H.323 specified on CCO while a Cisco SE advised me to use 
  > SCCP.

  There has been lengthy discussion on this list regarding the issues of
  faxing vs. ATAs. I have no first hand experience yet (coming soon), but
  AFAIK it should work with skinny as long as you tweak the ATA correctly.
  You have to set at least one bit mask in the device so it forcibly talks
  G.711u/a. I've tested this only briefly and against a CCM, but CCME is
  on the agenda.
   
  > Have anyone tried registering CME DN's with a GK ?

  Yes, works out of the box. If subscribed to a GK CCME registers all its
  EPhone-DNs at the GK. Together with a RAS dialpeer you can easily
  distri-
  bute DNs dynamically over a cloud of CCMEs and dial to every of them,
  the
  closesed thing to dynamic call routig I've found so far.

  > and also registering ATA's with a GK ?

  With Skinny they are just ephones so it works out of the box. I don't
  know how they would register in H.323 mode, though - they should
  register
  themselves then, needing correct config for it, if that's at all
  possible.
   
  > I've created Service Provider setup's with ATA's running SIP. But in 
  > this scenario it looks like H.323 would be the right choice for the
  CME 
  > solution.

  Only if you absolutely don't get it running with Skinny. If there are
  any known bugs which reliably prevent this and have no known and/or
  acceptable workarounds, I'd like to know more about them as well.
  Sales dropped in ATAs because they are cheaper than VWIC-*FXS and I've
  got to deal with it :-/

  HTH,
  Andre.
  -- 
                    The _S_anta _C_laus _O_peration
    or "how to turn a complete illusion into a neverending money source"

  -> Andre Beck    +++ ABP-RIPE +++    IBH Prof. Dr. Horn GmbH, Dresden <-
  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip





  ------------------------------

  Message: 8
  Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:02:34 +0200
  From: "Tamer Mohamed Bayomy" <tamer.bayomy at xceedcc.com>
  Subject: [cisco-voip] Phone stuck in Forward..
  To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  Message-ID:

  <72C99EF734F5AA449E45D132B979D1D901642875 at XCEEDMAIL.Masreya.local>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

  Dear All,

  I have a weird problem with one of Cisco IP phone 7940 that is
  registered in 
  CCM 4, the user using this IP phone once made forward to another Cisco
  IP phone 7940 then he wanted to cancel this forward he is unsuccessful,
  can anyone help with this problem as I even deleted the 2nd phone and
  still the 1st phone still forwarding the calls can't stop this
  forward?!!!

  Any help?!!
  Regards.. 




  ------------------------------

  Message: 9
  Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:40:42 -0400
  From: "Eric McKinney" <emckinney at fuquay-varina.org>
  Subject: [cisco-voip] Berbee InformaCast
  To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  Message-ID: <200504071234.j37CYnUc072188 at puck.nether.net>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

  We are looking at putting in Berbee's InformaCast for paging, has anyone
  used this?  Looking to get any pro's or con's on it.

   

  Thanks,

   

  Eric

   

   

  -------------- next part --------------
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/445605
  56/attachment.html

  ------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


  End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33
  ******************************************

  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/cbb4be53/attachment-0001.html


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list