[cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

Thu Apr 7 12:27:41 EDT 2005

I only have a 1.5 hour window to do this on a pub and a sub.  Do you
think I can get it done in that time?

Scott

________________________________

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:23 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Brad Waldbauer; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

it's a 685MB file which takes a while to decompress. There was one
reboot almost immediately after the install started, then i think only
one more after the install was done. I can't remember the time it took,
i left the box for a while.

Make sure you have ample free space, at least 4GB. 

	----- Original Message ----- 

	From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org>  

	To: Brad Waldbauer <mailto:Brad at isccorp.net>  ;
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 

	Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 12:21 PM

	Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

	How long was the .3 upgrade from the .2?  how many reboots?

	-----Original Message-----
	From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
	[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brad
Waldbauer
	Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:17 AM
	To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

	I just did a new install to 4.1.2 and then to .3 and it went
fine.  I
	just hit the exe and away it went. I'm just starting to program
my
	pieces and I haven't had any problems.... yet.  LOL.

	Brad
	ISC - Information Systems Consulting

	-----Original Message-----
	From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
	[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
	Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 06:35 AM
	To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33

	Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

	To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
	or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

	You can reach the person managing the list at
	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

	When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
	than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."

	Today's Topics:

	   1. 4.1.2 to 3 (Voll, Scott)
	   2. can not upgrade lic on cue  (james)
	   3. Re: AS5400-HPX platform restriction (Jon Lewis)
	   4. install ccm 4.12 erroe ( ??? )
	   5. IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in queue problem
	      (Gawie Herholdt (GSP))
	   6. : Question about Java programming (Aurelien FACHAUX)
	   7. RE: 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and ATAfax
	      Passthrough (Boda Gy?rgy)
	   8. Phone stuck in Forward.. (Tamer Mohamed Bayomy)
	   9. Berbee InformaCast (Eric McKinney)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

	Message: 1
	Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:51:12 -0700
	From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
	Subject: [cisco-voip] 4.1.2 to 3
	To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
	Message-ID:
<D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01511C20 at VISHNU.wesd.org>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

	Anyone upgrade from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3 yet?  The PDF attached is
really
	designed for 4.0 and 3.3 to 4.1 so I'm looking for a better doc.
Do I
	just need to install it like a SR?

	Thanks for any input.

	Scott

	------------------------------

	Message: 2
	Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:21:33 -0400
	From: "james" <jgrace at digitelusa.net>
	Subject: [cisco-voip] can not upgrade lic on cue 
	To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
	Message-ID: <000201c53afc$8e6a2de0$320d020a at digitelcorp.com>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

	I having a problem with upgrading the lic pkg on my cue nm .  i
was fine
	with the software upgrade. and unity is working at this time.
but cue
	will not take the lic pkg file.  the ftp transfer goes fine and
	completes. i reload and nothing, it still have the same 12
mailboxs.  im
	trying to up grade to a 100mb pkg.  i call tac in on it and ive
had no
	luck....

	James Grace 
	System Engineer /Professional Srvc.
	MCSE MCSA MCDBA CCNA CCNP CQS

	-------------- next part --------------
	An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
	URL:

https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050406/96ffc1
	38/attachment-0001.html

	------------------------------

	Message: 3
	Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:12:18 -0400 (EDT)
	From: Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org>
	Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] AS5400-HPX platform restriction
	To: Ryan Fields <jryan.fields at gmail.com>
	Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504062305030.12430 at web1.mmaero.com>
	Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

	On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Ryan Fields wrote:

	> We are currently running voip service using an AS5400-HPX
	> and would like to have off-ramp faxing as well.  I did a
couple
	> of tries of having both voice calls and off-ramp process at
the
	> same time.  So far its working fine but to be on the safe side
	> and not degrade its performance, I'd like to find its platform
	> restrictions. How can I verify the maximum simultaneous

	AFAIK, cisco does not publicly release such specs.  I had a
customer
	trying to do fax broadcasting with a AS5400-HPX about year and a
half
	ago.
	You might find something in the cisco-nas archive around Aug
2003...but
	off the top of my head, I think we got up to somewhere around
150
	simultaneous outgoing faxes, but that was with the box doing
absolutely
	nothing else (other than the occasional crash), dedicating all
its CPU
	to
	faxing.  I wouldn't expect it to do reasonable VOIP quality with
	anywhere
	near that number of faxes going on at the same time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
	 Jon Lewis                   |  I route
	 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
	 Atlantic Net                |
	_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public
key_________

	------------------------------

	Message: 4
	Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:59:36 +0800 (CST)
	From: " ??? " <jianghb at netease.com>
	Subject: [cisco-voip] install ccm 4.12 erroe
	To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Message-ID: <4254CC43.000019.10977 at m217.mail.netease.com>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"

	04/08/2005 14:13:02.326 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall
iuRunCommand:
	szCmd_ = "C:\utils\shutdown.exe" /L /R /Y /T:0 
	04/08/2005 14:13:02.876 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall
CreateProcess:
	Error: 3: The system cannot find the path specified. 

	04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize Did not find
	file: "C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1.CCM\LOCALS~1\CCMServices.ctl" 
	04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize
FindFirstFile:
	Error: 2: The system cannot find the file specified. 

	WHO???

	------------------------------

	Message: 5
	Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:17:42 +0200
	From: "Gawie Herholdt \(GSP\)" <herholgs at telkom.co.za>
	Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in queue
problem
	To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
	Message-ID:

<4561B54D504B79499D37BB32C86A67FE01C75411 at CNTRRA20-XCS00.telkom.co.za>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

	Hi

	I have a problem with a 3.1(2) IPCC Express system where 1 call
is
	stuck in the queue for more than 3 hours now. The system works
fine -
	all incoming calls are being queued / de-queued but just this
one call
	is stuck in the queue. Is there a way to clear this call without
	restarting the engine? I have about 6 call center groups on
there and
	do not want to affect all of them.

	Thanks

	Gawie

	Thanks and regards,

	Gawie Herholdt

	Snr Network Specialist, CCIE 7668 (R&S)

	Telkom SA (Pty) Ltd

	27-84-607-7371 (Mobile)

	27-12-680-7991 (IP Phone)

	27-12-680-0028 (Fax)

==================================================================
	This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA
Limited
	e-mail legal notice available at
	http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
	-------------- next part --------------
	An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
	URL:

https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/309e42
	cb/attachment-0001.html

	------------------------------

	Message: 6
	Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:19:48 +0200
	From: "Aurelien FACHAUX" <aurelienfachaux at hotmail.com>
	Subject: [cisco-voip] : Question about Java programming
	To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Message-ID: <BAY106-F13A7D90921846C9D7934C2A23E0 at phx.gbl>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed

	Hi everybody,

	I have a real problem with the CISCOIPPHONESTATUS AXL tag... In
fact, I
	want 
	to know if it exists a way to use it with Java in order to
implement an 
	interface with JTAPI...

	I need to generate a call and to display caller informations on
IP PHONE

	screen.

	If you have some sourcecode or advice, don't hesitate ton
contact me.

	Best regards.

	Aur?lien.

_________________________________________________________________
	Ne cherchez plus, trouvez ! Avec le nouveau MSN Search. 
	http://search.msn.fr/

	------------------------------

	Message: 7
	Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:41:51 +0200
	From: Boda Gy?rgy <gyorgy.boda at nextiraone.hu>
	Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager
Express and
	ATAfax Passthrough
	To: "Andre Beck" <cisco-voip at ibh.net>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
	Message-ID:

<F3CFD039AAEB4244B1FE1F48B2821A16116B3D at aebserver01.alcatel-ebs.intra>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

	ATA to GK registration:

	configure via ATA's web page
	GK= 21.3.3.3
	GKID=<zone name>
	AutMethod = 0x00000004
	PWD0 = 1#
	AudioMode=0x00150015 for fax pass thru
	[even though you will see stars, just type 1# in this field]
	UID0 = 3003 <DN>
	LBR = 3 for G729

	Regs,

	Gy?rgy Boda

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Andre Beck [mailto:cisco-voip at ibh.net] 
	Sent: 2005. ?prilis 6. 18:16
	To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager
Express and
	ATAfax Passthrough

	On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:43:09PM +0200, Lasse Christiansen
wrote:
	> 
	> I've really been confused as to Cisco's recommendations on the
ATA. 
	> I've seen H.323 specified on CCO while a Cisco SE advised me
to use 
	> SCCP.

	There has been lengthy discussion on this list regarding the
issues of
	faxing vs. ATAs. I have no first hand experience yet (coming
soon), but
	AFAIK it should work with skinny as long as you tweak the ATA
correctly.
	You have to set at least one bit mask in the device so it
forcibly talks
	G.711u/a. I've tested this only briefly and against a CCM, but
CCME is
	on the agenda.

	> Have anyone tried registering CME DN's with a GK ?

	Yes, works out of the box. If subscribed to a GK CCME registers
all its
	EPhone-DNs at the GK. Together with a RAS dialpeer you can
easily
	distri-
	bute DNs dynamically over a cloud of CCMEs and dial to every of
them,
	the
	closesed thing to dynamic call routig I've found so far.

	> and also registering ATA's with a GK ?

	With Skinny they are just ephones so it works out of the box. I
don't
	know how they would register in H.323 mode, though - they should
	register
	themselves then, needing correct config for it, if that's at all
	possible.

	> I've created Service Provider setup's with ATA's running SIP.
But in 
	> this scenario it looks like H.323 would be the right choice
for the
	CME 
	> solution.

	Only if you absolutely don't get it running with Skinny. If
there are
	any known bugs which reliably prevent this and have no known
and/or
	acceptable workarounds, I'd like to know more about them as
well.
	Sales dropped in ATAs because they are cheaper than VWIC-*FXS
and I've
	got to deal with it :-/

	HTH,
	Andre.
	-- 
	                  The _S_anta _C_laus _O_peration
	  or "how to turn a complete illusion into a neverending money
source"

	-> Andre Beck    +++ ABP-RIPE +++    IBH Prof. Dr. Horn GmbH,
Dresden <-
	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

	------------------------------

	Message: 8
	Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:02:34 +0200
	From: "Tamer Mohamed Bayomy" <tamer.bayomy at xceedcc.com>
	Subject: [cisco-voip] Phone stuck in Forward..
	To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
	Message-ID:

<72C99EF734F5AA449E45D132B979D1D901642875 at XCEEDMAIL.Masreya.local>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

	Dear All,

	I have a weird problem with one of Cisco IP phone 7940 that is
	registered in 
	CCM 4, the user using this IP phone once made forward to another
Cisco
	IP phone 7940 then he wanted to cancel this forward he is
unsuccessful,
	can anyone help with this problem as I even deleted the 2nd
phone and
	still the 1st phone still forwarding the calls can't stop this
	forward?!!!

	Any help?!!
	Regards.. 

	------------------------------

	Message: 9
	Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:40:42 -0400
	From: "Eric McKinney" <emckinney at fuquay-varina.org>
	Subject: [cisco-voip] Berbee InformaCast
	To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
	Message-ID: <200504071234.j37CYnUc072188 at puck.nether.net>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

	We are looking at putting in Berbee's InformaCast for paging,
has anyone
	used this?  Looking to get any pro's or con's on it.

	Thanks,

	Eric

	-------------- next part --------------
	An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
	URL:

https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/445605
	56/attachment.html

	------------------------------

	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

	End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33
	******************************************

	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

	_______________________________________________
	cisco-voip mailing list
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/c8617243/attachment-0001.html