[cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

Voll, Scott Scott.Voll at wesd.org
Thu Apr 7 12:40:39 EDT 2005


I do backups nightly.  Not a problem.  And I just removed a drive a week
or so ago.

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:36 AM
To: Voll, Scott; Brad Waldbauer; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

 

That would be cutting it very close I think. Especially because they
want you to do a backup first.

	----- Original Message ----- 

	From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org>  

	To: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>  ; Brad Waldbauer
<mailto:Brad at isccorp.net>  ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 

	Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 12:27 PM

	Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

	 

	I only have a 1.5 hour window to do this on a pub and a sub.  Do
you think I can get it done in that time?

	 

	Scott

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca] 
	Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:23 AM
	To: Voll, Scott; Brad Waldbauer; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

	 

	it's a 685MB file which takes a while to decompress. There was
one reboot almost immediately after the install started, then i think
only one more after the install was done. I can't remember the time it
took, i left the box for a while.

	 

	Make sure you have ample free space, at least 4GB. 

		----- Original Message ----- 

		From: Voll, Scott <mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org>  

		To: Brad Waldbauer <mailto:Brad at isccorp.net>  ;
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 

		Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 12:21 PM

		Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3

		 

		How long was the .3 upgrade from the .2?  how many
reboots?
		
		
		-----Original Message-----
		From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
		[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Brad Waldbauer
		Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:17 AM
		To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		Subject: [cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3
		
		I just did a new install to 4.1.2 and then to .3 and it
went fine.  I
		just hit the exe and away it went. I'm just starting to
program my
		pieces and I haven't had any problems.... yet.  LOL.
		
		Brad
		ISC - Information Systems Consulting
		
		-----Original Message-----
		From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
		[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
		cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
		Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 06:35 AM
		To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33
		
		Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		
		To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
		or, via email, send a message with subject or body
'help' to
		cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
		
		You can reach the person managing the list at
		cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
		
		When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is
more specific
		than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
		
		
		Today's Topics:
		
		   1. 4.1.2 to 3 (Voll, Scott)
		   2. can not upgrade lic on cue  (james)
		   3. Re: AS5400-HPX platform restriction (Jon Lewis)
		   4. install ccm 4.12 erroe ( ??? )
		   5. IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in queue problem
		      (Gawie Herholdt (GSP))
		   6. : Question about Java programming (Aurelien
FACHAUX)
		   7. RE: 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and
ATAfax
		      Passthrough (Boda Gy?rgy)
		   8. Phone stuck in Forward.. (Tamer Mohamed Bayomy)
		   9. Berbee InformaCast (Eric McKinney)
		
		
	
----------------------------------------------------------------------
		
		Message: 1
		Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:51:12 -0700
		From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
		Subject: [cisco-voip] 4.1.2 to 3
		To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
		Message-ID:
<D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01511C20 at VISHNU.wesd.org>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
		
		Anyone upgrade from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3 yet?  The PDF
attached is really
		designed for 4.0 and 3.3 to 4.1 so I'm looking for a
better doc.  Do I
		just need to install it like a SR?
		
		Thanks for any input.
		
		Scott
		
		
		
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 2
		Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:21:33 -0400
		From: "james" <jgrace at digitelusa.net>
		Subject: [cisco-voip] can not upgrade lic on cue 
		To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
		Message-ID:
<000201c53afc$8e6a2de0$320d020a at digitelcorp.com>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
		
		I having a problem with upgrading the lic pkg on my cue
nm .  i was fine
		with the software upgrade. and unity is working at this
time.  but cue
		will not take the lic pkg file.  the ftp transfer goes
fine and
		completes. i reload and nothing, it still have the same
12 mailboxs.  im
		trying to up grade to a 100mb pkg.  i call tac in on it
and ive had no
		luck....
		
		James Grace 
		System Engineer /Professional Srvc.
		MCSE MCSA MCDBA CCNA CCNP CQS
		
		-------------- next part --------------
		An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
		URL:
	
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050406/96ffc1
		38/attachment-0001.html
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 3
		Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:12:18 -0400 (EDT)
		From: Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org>
		Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] AS5400-HPX platform
restriction
		To: Ryan Fields <jryan.fields at gmail.com>
		Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		Message-ID:
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0504062305030.12430 at web1.mmaero.com>
		Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
		
		On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Ryan Fields wrote:
		
		> We are currently running voip service using an
AS5400-HPX
		> and would like to have off-ramp faxing as well.  I did
a couple
		> of tries of having both voice calls and off-ramp
process at the
		> same time.  So far its working fine but to be on the
safe side
		> and not degrade its performance, I'd like to find its
platform
		> restrictions. How can I verify the maximum
simultaneous
		
		AFAIK, cisco does not publicly release such specs.  I
had a customer
		trying to do fax broadcasting with a AS5400-HPX about
year and a half
		ago.
		You might find something in the cisco-nas archive around
Aug 2003...but
		off the top of my head, I think we got up to somewhere
around 150
		simultaneous outgoing faxes, but that was with the box
doing absolutely
		nothing else (other than the occasional crash),
dedicating all its CPU
		to
		faxing.  I wouldn't expect it to do reasonable VOIP
quality with
		anywhere
		near that number of faxes going on at the same time.
		
	
----------------------------------------------------------------------
		 Jon Lewis                   |  I route
		 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
		 Atlantic Net                |
		_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP
public key_________
		
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 4
		Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:59:36 +0800 (CST)
		From: " ??? " <jianghb at netease.com>
		Subject: [cisco-voip] install ccm 4.12 erroe
		To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		Message-ID:
<4254CC43.000019.10977 at m217.mail.netease.com>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
		
		04/08/2005 14:13:02.326 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall
iuRunCommand:
		szCmd_ = "C:\utils\shutdown.exe" /L /R /Y /T:0 
		04/08/2005 14:13:02.876 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall
CreateProcess:
		Error: 3: The system cannot find the path specified. 
		
		04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize Did
not find
		file:
"C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1.CCM\LOCALS~1\CCMServices.ctl" 
		04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize
FindFirstFile:
		Error: 2: The system cannot find the file specified. 
		
		WHO???
		
		
		
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 5
		Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:17:42 +0200
		From: "Gawie Herholdt \(GSP\)" <herholgs at telkom.co.za>
		Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in
queue problem
		To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
		Message-ID:
		
	
<4561B54D504B79499D37BB32C86A67FE01C75411 at CNTRRA20-XCS00.telkom.co.za>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
		
		
		Hi
		
		
		
		I have a problem with a 3.1(2) IPCC Express system where
1 call is
		stuck in the queue for more than 3 hours now. The system
works fine -
		all incoming calls are being queued / de-queued but just
this one call
		is stuck in the queue. Is there a way to clear this call
without
		restarting the engine? I have about 6 call center groups
on there and
		do not want to affect all of them.
		
		
		
		Thanks
		
		Gawie
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		Thanks and regards,
		
		Gawie Herholdt
		
		Snr Network Specialist, CCIE 7668 (R&S)
		
		Telkom SA (Pty) Ltd
		
		27-84-607-7371 (Mobile)
		
		27-12-680-7991 (IP Phone)
		
		27-12-680-0028 (Fax)
		
		
		
		
		
	
==================================================================
		This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom
SA Limited
		e-mail legal notice available at
		http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
		-------------- next part --------------
		An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
		URL:
	
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/309e42
		cb/attachment-0001.html
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 6
		Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:19:48 +0200
		From: "Aurelien FACHAUX" <aurelienfachaux at hotmail.com>
		Subject: [cisco-voip] : Question about Java programming
		To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		Message-ID:
<BAY106-F13A7D90921846C9D7934C2A23E0 at phx.gbl>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1;
format=flowed
		
		Hi everybody,
		
		I have a real problem with the CISCOIPPHONESTATUS AXL
tag... In fact, I
		want 
		to know if it exists a way to use it with Java in order
to implement an 
		interface with JTAPI...
		
		I need to generate a call and to display caller
informations on IP PHONE
		
		screen.
		
		If you have some sourcecode or advice, don't hesitate
ton contact me.
		
		Best regards.
		
		Aur?lien.
		
	
_________________________________________________________________
		Ne cherchez plus, trouvez ! Avec le nouveau MSN Search. 
		http://search.msn.fr/
		
		
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 7
		Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:41:51 +0200
		From: Boda Gy?rgy <gyorgy.boda at nextiraone.hu>
		Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery)
Callmanager Express and
		ATAfax Passthrough
		To: "Andre Beck" <cisco-voip at ibh.net>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
		Message-ID:
		
	
<F3CFD039AAEB4244B1FE1F48B2821A16116B3D at aebserver01.alcatel-ebs.intra>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
		
		ATA to GK registration:
		
		configure via ATA's web page
		GK= 21.3.3.3
		GKID=<zone name>
		AutMethod = 0x00000004
		PWD0 = 1#
		AudioMode=0x00150015 for fax pass thru
		[even though you will see stars, just type 1# in this
field]
		UID0 = 3003 <DN>
		LBR = 3 for G729
		
		Regs,
		
		Gy?rgy Boda
		
		-----Original Message-----
		From: Andre Beck [mailto:cisco-voip at ibh.net] 
		Sent: 2005. ?prilis 6. 18:16
		To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery)
Callmanager Express and
		ATAfax Passthrough
		
		On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:43:09PM +0200, Lasse
Christiansen wrote:
		> 
		> I've really been confused as to Cisco's
recommendations on the ATA. 
		> I've seen H.323 specified on CCO while a Cisco SE
advised me to use 
		> SCCP.
		
		There has been lengthy discussion on this list regarding
the issues of
		faxing vs. ATAs. I have no first hand experience yet
(coming soon), but
		AFAIK it should work with skinny as long as you tweak
the ATA correctly.
		You have to set at least one bit mask in the device so
it forcibly talks
		G.711u/a. I've tested this only briefly and against a
CCM, but CCME is
		on the agenda.
		 
		> Have anyone tried registering CME DN's with a GK ?
		
		Yes, works out of the box. If subscribed to a GK CCME
registers all its
		EPhone-DNs at the GK. Together with a RAS dialpeer you
can easily
		distri-
		bute DNs dynamically over a cloud of CCMEs and dial to
every of them,
		the
		closesed thing to dynamic call routig I've found so far.
		
		> and also registering ATA's with a GK ?
		
		With Skinny they are just ephones so it works out of the
box. I don't
		know how they would register in H.323 mode, though -
they should
		register
		themselves then, needing correct config for it, if
that's at all
		possible.
		 
		> I've created Service Provider setup's with ATA's
running SIP. But in 
		> this scenario it looks like H.323 would be the right
choice for the
		CME 
		> solution.
		
		Only if you absolutely don't get it running with Skinny.
If there are
		any known bugs which reliably prevent this and have no
known and/or
		acceptable workarounds, I'd like to know more about them
as well.
		Sales dropped in ATAs because they are cheaper than
VWIC-*FXS and I've
		got to deal with it :-/
		
		HTH,
		Andre.
		-- 
		                  The _S_anta _C_laus _O_peration
		  or "how to turn a complete illusion into a neverending
money source"
		
		-> Andre Beck    +++ ABP-RIPE +++    IBH Prof. Dr. Horn
GmbH, Dresden <-
		_______________________________________________
		cisco-voip mailing list
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
		
		
		
		
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 8
		Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:02:34 +0200
		From: "Tamer Mohamed Bayomy" <tamer.bayomy at xceedcc.com>
		Subject: [cisco-voip] Phone stuck in Forward..
		To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
		Message-ID:
		
	
<72C99EF734F5AA449E45D132B979D1D901642875 at XCEEDMAIL.Masreya.local>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
		
		Dear All,
		
		I have a weird problem with one of Cisco IP phone 7940
that is
		registered in 
		CCM 4, the user using this IP phone once made forward to
another Cisco
		IP phone 7940 then he wanted to cancel this forward he
is unsuccessful,
		can anyone help with this problem as I even deleted the
2nd phone and
		still the 1st phone still forwarding the calls can't
stop this
		forward?!!!
		
		Any help?!!
		Regards.. 
		
		
		
		
		------------------------------
		
		Message: 9
		Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:40:42 -0400
		From: "Eric McKinney" <emckinney at fuquay-varina.org>
		Subject: [cisco-voip] Berbee InformaCast
		To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
		Message-ID:
<200504071234.j37CYnUc072188 at puck.nether.net>
		Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
		
		We are looking at putting in Berbee's InformaCast for
paging, has anyone
		used this?  Looking to get any pro's or con's on it.
		
		 
		
		Thanks,
		
		 
		
		Eric
		
		 
		
		 
		
		-------------- next part --------------
		An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
		URL:
	
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/445605
		56/attachment.html
		
		------------------------------
		
		_______________________________________________
		cisco-voip mailing list
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
		
		
		End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33
		******************************************
		
		_______________________________________________
		cisco-voip mailing list
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
		
		_______________________________________________
		cisco-voip mailing list
		cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
		https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/7b9946bc/attachment-0001.html


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list