[cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Fri Apr 8 18:30:14 EDT 2005
As you can see by the numerous postings, there are several different ways to deploy a dial plan, each with their advantages and disadvantages. What is important is to plan out what your users look like and where you might see some restrictions coming in play. The SRND helps with describing some of the scenarios and technique, i.e. device/line approach vs line approach. You'll definately need a crystal ball to see what the future might look like - and if it works as good as ours, you'll only have to redesign your dialplan once. ;)
----- -----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. lelio at uoguelph.ca.eh
Network Analyst (CCS)
University of Guelph FAX:(519) 767-1060 JNHN
Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 TEL:(519) 824-4120 x56354
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
mob lawyer: your people insulted my brother.
dr. house: what? romano in the parmesan cheese shaker again?
----- Original Message -----
From: Marcello Pedersen
To: Voll, Scott ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
So let say I have 2 sites with centralized CCM.
Site A :
HQ_CCS
and three partitions
BR_911_local_and_toll_free
BR_Long_Distance
BR_International
Site b:
Branch_CCS
and three partitions
BR_ 911_local_and_toll_free
BR_Long_Distance
BR_International
There shouldn't be a problem with user A calling user B right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:07 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
To add to that we have two different CSS in each location. One for staff so they can call long distance and one for common area phones that can only dial local. If you're a larger enterprise you might look at doing it by department. It all comes down to how you want to service people. I think it's best to keep your options open. More partions more CSS add complexity but they also open up more options.
Scott
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:11 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
There is a fundamental restriction with the number of 'characters' a calling search space can contain in it's partition list - I'm pretty sure that number is 512 characters. That means there is no limit to the number of partitions in a calling search space per se, but the list of partitions, including the semi-colon seperator can not exceed 512 characters.
That being said, devices of a similar nature/purpose should be grouped together in their own partition, allowing you to control access to those devices. Voicemail is a good example of one where you really don't want people to access the ports directly, you want them to access a pilot and the pilot number is a translation to the first voicemail port which rings busy/noanswer to the next voicemail port. Coincedentally, this structure has changed in 4.0, voicemail ports no longer have a ring busy/noanswer destination. However, this still doesn't change the principle behind 'hiding' the voicemail ports.
It also depends on the dialplan strategy you take with respect to off-net access. We've taken an approach where the device has access to all offnet patterns and the line's CSS included route patterns that block access.
Something to remember, is to keep the <none> partition empty. Since by default, the <none> partition is searched, there is no easy way to block a CSS from searching the <none> partition for a DN to match other than explicitly adding route patterns that block it. It is handy to have an emergency number there so a phone, even misconfigured, can still call the emergency number.
----- Original Message -----
From: Marcello Pedersen
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 3:59 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
Hey Everyone,
I am wondering what are the best practices for implanting CCS and partitions. Should each site have its own partition and CCS? How about VM ports should they be in a in its own partition.
also can I forward a DN to the VM pilot number so user can access centralized VM from the road?
Regards,
Marcello
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050408/a020c7d5/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list