[cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Mon Apr 11 22:49:13 EDT 2005
The one caveat to alternate extensions is that anyone can enter them and be transferred to the persons primary DN.
----- Original Message -----
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
It all depends on what you want the caller to hear. For a personal greeting to answer and take a message, then the line has to be forwarded to a number first which can have translations after. If you want callers to simply hear the Unity opening greeting, than make the DID a translation to the same voicemail pilot. There is no need to have seperate voicemail pilot numbers unless you want the seperate sites to hear different opening greetings. As long as the callers cell phone number or home number is an alternate extension, all they have to do is press * and it will ask them for their password.
----- -----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. lelio at uoguelph.ca.eh
Network Analyst (CCS)
University of Guelph FAX:(519) 767-1060 JNHN
Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 TEL:(519) 824-4120 x56354
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
mob lawyer: your people insulted my brother.
dr. house: what? romano in the parmesan cheese shaker again?
----- Original Message -----
From: Marcello Pedersen
To: Voll, Scott ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 6:37 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
Thanks everyone. I just rolled out today six new sites (all in pilot testing phase with no major problems) I settled in the following approach:
All DNs are in PT_Default
4 CSS for DNs
Internal
Local
National
International
Each site has:
1 region
1 Device pool
1 CSS for the devices for 911 and local calling
each device in each branch office gets the CSS for devices
each dn gets a CSS based on the class of restriction
I created one additional PT for vm ports and on ccs for vm pilot. Additionally, I created route lists with the gateways in case any gateway is down. I followed your guys recommendation and read 2 cisco books which were awesome, I will definitely recommend them to any new comer to CCM like myself:
Cisco CallManager Best Practices
Cisco IP Telephony : Planning, Design, Implementation, Operation and Optimization.
LAST QUESTION:
I want to create a number so users can call the centralized VM locally. For example, our pilot number is 5555 and I want to create the number 2222 that gets send to the pilot number 5555. How can I do this and still retain the caller originating caller ID so the call to 5555 does come from 2222 but from the originating number. What I am trying to achieve is having a local DID in each site so users can call a local number from their home phones/cell phones and use the alternate extension on Unity.
Thanks a bunch.
Marcello
-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 3:34 PM
To: Marcello Pedersen; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
Good start.
I hope you have more then one gateway, right? I would make 911 it's own partion and route it out the local gateway.
Then I would probably make two more partions. HQ_DN's and Br_DNs.
HQ_CSS
HQ_911
HQ_DNs
BR_DNs
HQ_LD
HQ_International
HQ_Toll Free
BR_CSS
BR_911
BR_DN
HQ_DN
BR_LD
BR_INTERnational
BR_toll free
That way you can make sure that all 911 calls go out the local PSTN connection. And if you want all calls to just go out the main PRI the CSS could be the same except for the 911 calls
I'm getting ready to do toll bypass. And AAR with it... Data entry anyone.
Scott
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Marcello Pedersen [mailto:mpedersen at touchbase.us]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:20 PM
To: Voll, Scott; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
So let say I have 2 sites with centralized CCM.
Site A :
HQ_CCS
and three partitions
BR_911_local_and_toll_free
BR_Long_Distance
BR_International
Site b:
Branch_CCS
and three partitions
BR_ 911_local_and_toll_free
BR_Long_Distance
BR_International
There shouldn't be a problem with user A calling user B right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:07 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
To add to that we have two different CSS in each location. One for staff so they can call long distance and one for common area phones that can only dial local. If you're a larger enterprise you might look at doing it by department. It all comes down to how you want to service people. I think it's best to keep your options open. More partions more CSS add complexity but they also open up more options.
Scott
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:11 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
There is a fundamental restriction with the number of 'characters' a calling search space can contain in it's partition list - I'm pretty sure that number is 512 characters. That means there is no limit to the number of partitions in a calling search space per se, but the list of partitions, including the semi-colon seperator can not exceed 512 characters.
That being said, devices of a similar nature/purpose should be grouped together in their own partition, allowing you to control access to those devices. Voicemail is a good example of one where you really don't want people to access the ports directly, you want them to access a pilot and the pilot number is a translation to the first voicemail port which rings busy/noanswer to the next voicemail port. Coincedentally, this structure has changed in 4.0, voicemail ports no longer have a ring busy/noanswer destination. However, this still doesn't change the principle behind 'hiding' the voicemail ports.
It also depends on the dialplan strategy you take with respect to off-net access. We've taken an approach where the device has access to all offnet patterns and the line's CSS included route patterns that block access.
Something to remember, is to keep the <none> partition empty. Since by default, the <none> partition is searched, there is no easy way to block a CSS from searching the <none> partition for a DN to match other than explicitly adding route patterns that block it. It is handy to have an emergency number there so a phone, even misconfigured, can still call the emergency number.
----- Original Message -----
From: Marcello Pedersen
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 3:59 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCS and Partitions best practices
Hey Everyone,
I am wondering what are the best practices for implanting CCS and partitions. Should each site have its own partition and CCS? How about VM ports should they be in a in its own partition.
also can I forward a DN to the VM pilot number so user can access centralized VM from the road?
Regards,
Marcello
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050411/6963cca4/attachment-0001.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list