[cisco-voip] CM 4.x memory recommendations

Wes Sisk wsisk at cisco.com
Thu Apr 21 08:12:30 EDT 2005


What process was spiking the CPU before you enabled ccm and cti.

Dedicated publisher implies just that, ccm and cti should not be 
running.  I'm pretty sure this is specifically discussed in the SRND and 
is certainly how we run test beds inside Cisco.

/Wes

Erick Bergquist wrote:

>Ryan,
>
>Thanks for the email on this. 
>
>Regarding the comments in the document, about the
>publisher having ccm.exe and cti.exe services running
>if it is doing call processing. We have a client who
>has a dedicated publisher and not doing call
>processing on 4.02aSR1 and their publisher was spiking
>to 100% and crashing when the ccm.exe and cti.exe
>services were not running. Cisco TAC had told us that
>those are required to run on dedicated publishers not
>doing call processing and to not put the publisher as
>part of a server group. Once we enabled those the 100%
>spikes stopped, etc. The publisher wasn't part of a
>server group either when we had problems.
>
>Thats fine, but just asking as this document seems to
>be misleading on that and want to understand the right
>and correct way to do that.
> 
>--- Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Just posted...
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/
>  
>
>>prod_bulletin0900aecd80284099.html
>>
>>-Ryan
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>    
>>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-voip mailing list
>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>  
>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list