[cisco-voip] CM 4.x memory recommendations

[Erick Bergquist]

It does on trying to activate a service, but not
deactivating a service. So you could deactivate RisDC
and not deactivate CTI or CallManager. Or you can
check CTI and Call Manager which automatically checks
RisDC , then uncheck RisDC and hit update and it will
activate call manager, CTI, and leave risDC
deactivated.

RisDC needs the cisco servicability reporter
activated, but you can deactivate that also after the
fact w/RisDC active.

Not a big deal though. 

--- Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:

> The CallManager service activation tool enforces
> most service dependences I
> am aware of.  If you enable CM, it forces RisDC
> enabled.
> 
> /Wes
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erick Bergquist [mailto:erickbe at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 3:49 PM
> To: Wes Sisk
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CM 4.x memory
> recommendations
> 
> 
> Wes,
> 
> Thanks. Do you know if there is a cisco doc that
> lists
> what should be enabled/disabled when a server is
> dedicated publisher?
> 
> --- Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> > RisDC should only be enabled if ccm is enabled.
> > if ccm is disabled, risdc should be disabled.
> >
> > /Wes
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erick Bergquist [mailto:erickbe at yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 12:27 PM
> > To: Wes Sisk
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM 4.x memory
> > recommendations
> >
> >
> > The RisDC service if i recall. I can check my
> > records
> > on this and reply back in a bit.
> >
> > --- Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> > > What process was spiking the CPU before you
> > enabled
> > > ccm and cti.
> > >
> > > Dedicated publisher implies just that, ccm and
> cti
> > > should not be
> > > running.  I'm pretty sure this is specifically
> > > discussed in the SRND and
> > > is certainly how we run test beds inside Cisco.
> > >
> > > /Wes
> > >
> > > Erick Bergquist wrote:
> > >
> > > >Ryan,
> > > >
> > > >Thanks for the email on this.
> > > >
> > > >Regarding the comments in the document, about
> the
> > > >publisher having ccm.exe and cti.exe services
> > > running
> > > >if it is doing call processing. We have a
> client
> > > who
> > > >has a dedicated publisher and not doing call
> > > >processing on 4.02aSR1 and their publisher was
> > > spiking
> > > >to 100% and crashing when the ccm.exe and
> cti.exe
> > > >services were not running. Cisco TAC had told
> us
> > > that
> > > >those are required to run on dedicated
> publishers
> > > not
> > > >doing call processing and to not put the
> > publisher
> > > as
> > > >part of a server group. Once we enabled those
> the
> > > 100%
> > > >spikes stopped, etc. The publisher wasn't part
> of
> > a
> > > >server group either when we had problems.
> > > >
> > > >Thats fine, but just asking as this document
> > seems
> > > to
> > > >be misleading on that and want to understand
> the
> > > right
> > > >and correct way to do that.
> > > >
> > > >--- Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Just posted...
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>prod_bulletin0900aecd80284099.html
> > > >>
> > > >>-Ryan
> > > >>
> > >
> >>_______________________________________________
> > > >>cisco-voip mailing list
> > > >>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >
> >
>
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> > > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around
> > > >http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >cisco-voip mailing list
> > > >cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >
> >
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com