FW: [cisco-voip] ATA versus VG224

[Ortiz, Carlos]

________________________________

From: Ortiz, Carlos 
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:06 AM
To: 'TechGuy'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] ATA versus VG224

 

The VG224's work really well with MGCP.  The only issue I have had is
that there is a bug with AAA on the VG224 that is addressed in newer
versions of code, but that would require a memory upgrade.  The best
thing I can tell you about them is that I installed one about 1 year ago
and another about 9 months ago.  Haven't touched them since..... :-)

 

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of TechGuy
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:51 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA versus VG224

 

Can someone share with me thoughts on ATA's versus VG224.  I have heard
that the VG224 is a little more reliable and less problamatic then the
ATA's

 

I believe the VG224 is a little more flexible in how you can configure
it?  Mainly looking for something to handle a bunch of fax machines.
Looking for the most reliable MGCP solution.

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20051205/22827b53/attachment.html