[cisco-voip] ATA versus VG224

[TechGuy]

Can anyone share with me some benefits of using a VG224 over a bunch of
ATA's?  Particularly interested in the pro's of a VG224 for fax machines
over the use of ATA's?




On 12/5/05, Ortiz, Carlos <CORTIZ at broward.org> wrote:
>
>  The VG224's work really well with MGCP.  The only issue I have had is
> that there is a bug with AAA on the VG224 that is addressed in newer
> versions of code, but that would require a memory upgrade.  The best thing I
> can tell you about them is that I installed one about 1 year ago and another
> about 9 months ago.  Haven't touched them since….. J
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *TechGuy
> *Sent:* Monday, December 05, 2005 10:51 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] ATA versus VG224
>
>
>
> Can someone share with me thoughts on ATA's versus VG224.  I have heard
> that the VG224 is a little more reliable and less problamatic then the ATA's
>
>
>
> I believe the VG224 is a little more flexible in how you can configure
> it?  Mainly looking for something to handle a bunch of fax machines.
> Looking for the most reliable MGCP solution.
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20051205/d76f4fd6/attachment.html