[cisco-voip] H.323 Dial Peer config
Ortiz, Carlos
CORTIZ at broward.org
Tue Dec 13 15:01:07 EST 2005
We currently use Centrex analog lines and Centrex PRI lines and they
both require you to pass the leading 9 to the PSTN. Does my dial peer 1
look correct for incoming calls? Do I just specify any port there? I
will definitely look into the Trunk group config.
Someone replied to me a couple of weeks back and said if I use an FXO
card with M1 designation (part VIC-4FXO-M1) and H.323 gateway I could
get caller ID. I just checked and this card reached EOL Jan 15, 2004.
I have the newer replacement cards VIC2-4FXO. I would hope these would
support that and more. Any thoughts on the caller ID issue would be
appreciated.
Carlos
-----Original Message-----
From: Erick Bergquist [mailto:erickbe at yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 10:38 PM
To: Ortiz, Carlos; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H.323 Dial Peer config
On the dial-peers, you are forwarding all digits so
that will also send the 9 that starts all your
destination patterns.
Usually with FXO, there is no inbound caller id to
tell it where to route call so on the voice-port you
need to use connection plar to route call somewhere
(This is same as Attendant DN setting on the endpoint
in CCM when using MGCP).
They have added trunk groups to IOS, so you can assign
voice ports to a trunkgroup, then have one dial-peer
pointing to the trunk group. You can then assign
preferences to voice-port that is a member of the
trunk group, etc. This requires a trunk group to be
configured globally. Under the trunkgroup config you
can configure hunt method, etc.
Erick
--- "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ at broward.org> wrote:
> I have never configured my FXO PSTN router
> connections with H.323, only
> MGCP. I did configure H.323 for PRI interfaces.
> Going by that and what
> I have refreshed with CCO docs, I have come up with
> a starting config to
> do FXO with H.323. Dial peer 1 would be for the
> incoming call leg on all
> calls. This assumes a 4 port FXO card. Does this
> appear correct? Have
> there been any improvements on the "hunting" for
> outbound calls beyond
> using the preference command? Any suggestions or
> help would be
> appreciated.
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>
> description ** Inbound Call leg all calls **
>
> incoming called-number .
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
> port 0/1/0
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 954 pots
>
> description ** Local 954,754 Calls **
>
> destination-pattern 9[7,9]54.......
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3
>
> progress_ind alert enable 8
>
> progress_ind progress enable 8
>
> progress_ind connect enable 8
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
> port 0/1/0
>
> forward-digits all
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 9542 pots
>
> description ** Local 954,754 Calls **
>
> destination-pattern 9[7,9]54.......
>
> preference 1
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3
>
> progress_ind alert enable 8
>
> progress_ind progress enable 8
>
> progress_ind connect enable 8
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
> port 0/1/1
>
> forward-digits all
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 9543 pots
>
> description ** Local 954,754 Calls **
>
> destination-pattern 9[7,9]54.......
>
> preference 2
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3
>
> progress_ind alert enable 8
>
> progress_ind progress enable 8
>
> progress_ind connect enable 8
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
> port 0/1/2
>
> forward-digits all
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 9544 pots
>
> description ** Local 954,754 Calls **
>
> destination-pattern 9[7,9]54.......
>
> preference 3
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3
>
> progress_ind alert enable 8
>
> progress_ind progress enable 8
>
> progress_ind connect enable 8
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
> port 0/1/3
>
> forward-digits all
>
>
>
> dial-peer voice 9999 voip
>
> description ** Inbound 357 nums to mr-cm-sub1 **
>
> destination-pattern [5-8]...
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3
>
> session target ipv4:10.100.200.21
>
> incoming called-number .
>
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>
> codec g711ulaw
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 99992 voip
>
> description ** Inbound 357 nums to mr-cm-pub **
>
> preference 2
>
> destination-pattern [5-8]...
>
> progress_ind setup enable 3
>
> session target ipv4:10.100.200.20
>
> incoming called-number .
>
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>
> codec g711ulaw
>
>
>
>
>
> Carlos Ortiz
>
> Senior Information Technology Specialist
>
> Broward County Office of Information Technology
>
> Data Communications
>
> 954-357-7981
>
> cortiz at broward.org
>
>
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list