[cisco-voip] Caller ID names and 4.x- Same Problem in the past.
Jim Koniecki
jkoniecki at comcast.net
Wed Dec 14 10:20:47 EST 2005
Peter,
I had a similar problem just the other week. In my case the "retired" user
had been with the company for 15 years and had the same DID number for his
employment duration. His calling name and number were still configured from
the old Centrex service they used to have before replacing it with an AVVID
system. We had to call the carried and have them clear out this entry on
the trunk.
I hope this helps.
Jim K
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ruttman, Peter G.
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:53 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID names and 4.x
We have two separate clusters (4.02 and 4.13) both that have issues where we
mask our outbound caller id numbers with our main number. For the name we
would like it to be the name of our company. For these two offices we get
occasional reports that a person that was once with our company or is still
with the company is showing up on the caller ID for people receiving calls
from us. In the case of the retired person that person is not even listed
on our Callmanager. He also only seems to show up when the call ends up at
certain carriers like Vonage.
Does Callmanager control anything with caller ID name?
Pete
The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the
attorney-client privilege. It is not intended for transmission to, or
receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in
error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received
the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the message. Legal advice
contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley &
Lardner LLP client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that
is the subject of this message, and may not be relied upon by any other
party.
Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written
advice include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains
advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless expressly stated otherwise
the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by
the recipient or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax
penalties, and was not written to support the promotion or marketing of any
transaction or matter discussed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20051214/ecf30669/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list