[cisco-voip] Caller Name ID possible via Facility IE with H.323?

[Erick Bergquist]

I think I recall some discussion on this list or in
the cisco forums about this being changed in a future
release of CME (and thus IOS hopefully). I'll have to
do some digging to see if I can find that again. 

--- Brian Feeny <bfeeny at mac.com> wrote:

> Thanks, I have a case open, but I am wanting a clear
> explanation of the "isdn supp-service name calling",
> and how it applies, if at all to H.323.
> 
> I am going to try to get Hellsouth to switch to
> Display IE, but I am not holding my breath.
> 
> Brian
>  
> On Thursday, December 15, 2005, at 07:22PM, Bell,
> Joe <Joe_Bell at adp.com> wrote:
> 
> >Brian,
> >
> >Unless someone knows any pfm, there is no way to
> accomplish caller-id on
> >a PRI with H.323 unless your provider switches the
> data into Display IE
> >(good luck with that).  Recently (using 12.4(4T), I
> opened a TAC case
> >about this issue to see if there was any way to
> accomplish this or if it
> >had been addressed in the new 12.4 train.  TAC sent
> me a clear answer
> >saying H.323 and caller-id are unsupported and in
> order to get it, I
> >needed to go to MGCP.
> >
> >Joe Bell
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of Brian Feeny
> >Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:23 AM
> >To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller Name ID possible via
> Facility IE with
> >H.323?
> >
> >
> >I have read the thread:
> >
>
>https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/2005-March/003509.html
> >
> >And was curious as to the outcome.  I have PRI's
> coming in from a 5ESS,
> >and the carrier is sending the ID in the facility
> IE (inbound calls to
> >us), and of course CM appears to want it in the
> display IE.  I have read
> >of ways CM would take it via the Facility ID if
> using MGCP AND NI2/3 or
> >MGCP AND QSIG.  Does any solution at all exist for
> H.323?  I have tried
> >to set my switch type for NI and QSIG, both work as
> far as
> >placing/receiving calls, but I still cannot get
> inbound name id.  I have
> >tried to set "isdn supp-service name calling" on
> the gateway as well but
> >it doesn't seem to fix it.  Gateways are running
> late 12.3T code, CM is
> >4.1(3)SR2.
> >
> >Sure I can try to battle it out with Bellsouth and
> ask them to change to
> >display IE, but I am sure they will not do it for
> me, I'll try though.
> >But I am hoping there is a solution for those of us
> with H.323 links.  I
> >could possibly get them to switch the circuit to
> NI2 or QSIG.  Like I
> >said switching the switch type on the gateway
> works, without having the
> >carrier do anything probably because its just
> compatible, but not sure
> >if formally having them change the switch emulation
> would do anything.
> >The q.931 output is definitely more "friendly" with
> QSIG/NI, as it
> >decodes the facility IE.  With 5ESS it doesn't like
> to receive the name
> >id facility ie stuff, it errors on it (but of
> course call completes).
> >
> >Brian
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-voip mailing list
> >cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> >This message and any attachments are intended only
> for the use of the addressee and may contain
> information that is privileged and confidential. If
> the reader of the message is not the intended
> recipient or an authorized representative of the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication
> in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and
> delete the message and any attachments from your
> system.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-voip mailing list
> >cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com