[cisco-voip] Unity 4

[Voll, Scott]

And just remember all the $$$ you spend just to make new voicemail
(email accounts). But I have been forced into this also.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:22 PM
To: King, Jesse
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4

The only huge difference between UM and voicemail only is how users 
check their voicemail.  Because of system load we don't support having 
on-box Exchange with UM as it's just asking for trouble.  We also don't 
support running Exchange 2003 on-box period.

If you've got Exchange 2003 already deployed then the best thing for 
you to do is to create a second AD account for folks who don't want or 
need UM.  Have this be their voicemail mailbox but leave it on whatever 
Exchange server you want.

-Ryan
On Feb 10, 2005, at 10:33 PM, King, Jesse wrote:

I am currently on Unity 3.x, looking to upgrade to 4.04? shortly -

A few questions -

Currently only doing voicemail only - If we choose to use the unified 
benefits, is it possible to say User 1 only gets voicemail on the 
phone, not in the inbox? User 2 gets both, etc? The reason being is 
that some people would use this feature, but a majority of them just 
don't need it.



Currently Exchange 5.5 is installed on the Unity box and is in a voice 
mail only mode - We have a separate exchange 2003 for email, is it 
going to be a nightmare to transition over to unified messaging during 
the 4.04 upgrade - I'm not even sure this is possible, need to do more 
reading....

Thanks..

Jesse


  _______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip