[cisco-voip] Extension sharing between Nortel PBX and CCM 4.0

[Dave Temkin]

One problem with this is they will get no caller ID on the Nortel most
likely (due to issues with Nortel Q.SIG).  If this is acceptable then yes,
that would work...


On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Wes Sisk wrote:

> You could almost get there by routing all calls to the CM side first.
> Configure a short forward no answer timer, and have the CFNA go to the
> Nortel phone.  Users that receive no answer when ip communicator is
> registered will have to wait a few extra ring cycles.  Users that get no
> answer when IP Communicator is not registered will not notice a difference.
>
> IP Communicator users will have the option of answering with IP when IPC
> is registered, otherwise calls will route to their notel phones.
>
> /Wes
>
> Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> >Only way I found to do this was using a line-side T1 from the Nortel and
> >assigning each extension to a channel and setting them up as FXS lines.
> >
> >Ugly, but no, on the Nortel side it's not possible to present a call to
> >both Q.SIG and a local phone without some very very expensive packages
> >(used for DR type scenarios)
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Steve G wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>Is it possible to share an extension between a Nortel PBX phone and
> >>CCM4.0IP Communicator using QSIG to link the two together? My goal is
> >>to initially
> >>have people using IP Communicator with the same extension as their Nortel
> >>Phone. This would make migration from TDM to IP phones very smooth.
> >>
> >>Thank you,
> >>Steve
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-voip mailing list
> >cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>