[cisco-voip] Extension sharing between Nortel PBX and CCM 4.0

[Wes Sisk]

You could almost get there by routing all calls to the CM side first.  
Configure a short forward no answer timer, and have the CFNA go to the 
Nortel phone.  Users that receive no answer when ip communicator is 
registered will have to wait a few extra ring cycles.  Users that get no 
answer when IP Communicator is not registered will not notice a difference.

IP Communicator users will have the option of answering with IP when IPC 
is registered, otherwise calls will route to their notel phones.

/Wes

Dave Temkin wrote:

>Only way I found to do this was using a line-side T1 from the Nortel and
>assigning each extension to a channel and setting them up as FXS lines.
>
>Ugly, but no, on the Nortel side it's not possible to present a call to
>both Q.SIG and a local phone without some very very expensive packages
>(used for DR type scenarios)
>
>
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Steve G wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hello,
>>Is it possible to share an extension between a Nortel PBX phone and
>>CCM4.0IP Communicator using QSIG to link the two together? My goal is
>>to initially
>>have people using IP Communicator with the same extension as their Nortel
>>Phone. This would make migration from TDM to IP phones very smooth.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Steve
>>
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-voip mailing list
>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>  
>