[cisco-voip] Star(*)-67
Andrew Herdman
aherdman at bcsglobal.com
Wed Sep 14 08:07:27 EDT 2005
That was it. I actually found it last night after spending two hours
flipping switches and such. I probably spent longer on it than I would
have if I had figured out earlier that some changes take about a minute
to propagate.
Thanks for yours and Wes's help.
Andrew
Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
>Andrew,
>
>I had the same problem a few months ago and I think it was fixed by changing
>the calling party presentation on the _gateway_ to "default" (it was set to
>"allowed" and was hence overriding the RP settings). YMMV
>
>Vincent
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
>>bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Herdman
>>Sent: mardi 13 septembre 2005 20:18
>>To: Wes Sisk
>>Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Star(*)-67
>>
>>Wes;
>>
>>Thanks for the very speedy reply.
>>
>>My version of call manager doesn't show "private", I've attached a
>>picture of what I have. I changed it from "Allowed" to restricted.
>>This had no effect unfortunately.
>>
>>Thanks again
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Wes Sisk wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>on your 8 route pattern change the 'calling party presentation' to
>>>
>>>
>>private.
>>
>>
>>>do not use *67, only preserve/strip the 8 as needed for your other
>>>
>>>
>>dialplan
>>
>>
>>>matches.
>>>
>>>/Wes
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Andrew Herdman
>>>Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 1:46 PM
>>>To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>Subject: [cisco-voip] Star(*)-67
>>>
>>>
>>>I have a Callmanager 3.3(x) with a mgcp managed PRI gateway (2651xm). I
>>>have a group of users who want to be able to block their outgoing
>>>caller-id on a per call basis. Basically they have asked if they dial 8
>>>for an outside line instead of 9, block the caller id. So, we tried
>>>this and prepended *67 to the number, after striping off the 8. Call is
>>>rejected by the ISDN provider. A call into the provider indicates that
>>>we (the callmanager) needs to actually do the *67 functionality. I am
>>>at a loss as to how to do this on a per-call demand basis for this
>>>group. Has anyone else been able to implement this, or similiar
>>>functionality?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>
>
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list