[cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

Ortiz, Carlos CORTIZ at broward.org
Mon Aug 7 15:43:53 EDT 2006


In this case I am configuring a 2811 running 12.4(9)T.  The show diag
shows me this whick makes sense since I ordered the PVDM 16 to 32
upgrade :

PVDM Slot 0:
        32-channel (G.711) Voice/Fax PVDMII DSP SIMM PVDM daughter card
        Hardware Revision        : 4.0
        Part Number              : 73-8539-05
        Board Revision           : A0
        Deviation Number         : 0
        Fab Version              : 04
        PCB Serial Number        : FOC101818WH
        RMA Test History         : 00
        RMA Number               : 0-0-0-0
        RMA History              : 00
        Processor type           : 00 
        Product (FRU) Number     : PVDM2-32

I was able to create the profiles for conferencing and transcoding.  I
am able to put max sessions for transcoding to 4, but I am not able to
select anything but 0 for conf. see below:

Lowrise(config)#dspfarm profile 1 conference 
Lowrise(config-dspfarm-profile)#maximum sessions ?
  <0-0>  Number of sessions assigned to this profile

I have a T1 WIC and a T1-1MFT card in the router but not sure why I
can't select sessions for the conf br.

Any clues would be appreciated.....


-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69 at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 2:45 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Ortiz, Carlos
Cc: Erik Erasmus (E); cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; Ted Nugent
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP resources on 2821

You also need to configure your devices in CM as
"Enhanced IOS devices" in case thats not clear in the
doc.

--- Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:

> The PDVM2s require the dspfarm profile
> configuration.   Yes you do  
> have to associate the profile to a sccp ccm group.
> 
> -Ryan
> 
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Ortiz, Carlos wrote:
> 
> This is a response to a 3 week old post. Did you
> guys ever get this
> working?  I am reading through the documentation and
> it's a bit
> confusing. You guys posted part of a config below,
> but I am reading and
> they mention Associating a DSP Farm Profile to a
> Cisco Unified
> CallManager Group.  Did you have to do this?
> 
> Which example would you follow for onboard ISR
> 28XX/38xx router PVDM2
> configuration??
> 
> Carlos
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of Erik Erasmus
> (E)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:55 PM
> To: Wydra, Jason; Ted Nugent;
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP
> resources on 2821
> 
> 
> I was wondering about the same thing
> 
> I will have a PVDM2-8 for normal termination of the
> BRIs and probably
> a PVDM2-32 for the conferencing  /transcoding
> 
> 
> 
> Erik Erasmus
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of Wydra, Jason
> Sent: 18 July 2006 09:46 PM
> To: Ted Nugent; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP
> resources on 2821
> 
> One more thing with the following....
> 
> voice-card 0
>   dspfarm
>   dsp services dspfarm
> 
> If I run a show diag, I see two PVDM2-32 modules.
> One is slot 0 and
> the
> other is slot 1. Does the voice-card command above
> denote the actual
> slot number of the PVDM? Reason I ask is because I
> want the PVDM in
> slot
> 0 to do transcoding and the PVDM in slot 1 to do
> conferencing. When I
> try to configure the following I get this:
> 
> ft-worth(config)#voice-card 1
>                              ^
> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
> 
> ft-worth(config)#voice-card ?
>    <0-2>  Voice interface slot #
> 
> ft-worth(config)#voice-card
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Nugent [mailto:tednugent69 at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:46 PM
> To: Wydra, Jason; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up local DSP
> resources on 2821
> 
> You need it all... confusing at first but after you
> set it up a couple times it's not so bad.
> 
> Makes me miss the old NM-HDV config :-/
> 
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgc
> r/
> vvfax_c/callc_c/ccm_c/intcnf2.htm#wp1061433
> 
> voice-card 0
>   dspfarm
>   dsp services dspfarm
> !
> !
> sccp local FA0/0
> sccp ccm <pub-ipaddr> identifier 2 version 4.0
> sccp ccm <sub-ipaddr> identifier 1 version 4.0
> sccp ip precedence 3
> sccp
> !
> sccp ccm group 1
>   associate ccm 2 priority 2
>   associate ccm 1 priority 1
>   associate profile 2 register <site>xcode
>   associate profile 1 register <site>conf
>   keepalive retries 5
>   switchover method immediate
>   switchback method immediate
>   switchback interval 15
> !
> dspfarm profile 2 transcode
>   codec g711ulaw
>   codec g711alaw
>   codec g729ar8
>   codec g729abr8
>   codec gsmfr
>   maximum sessions 12
>   associate application SCCP
> !
> dspfarm profile 1 conference
>   codec g711ulaw
>   codec g711alaw
>   codec g729ar8
>   codec g729abr8
>   codec g729r8
>   codec g729br8
>   maximum sessions 8
>   associate application SCCP
> 
> 
> --- "Wydra, Jason" <jwydra at Burwood.com> wrote:
> 
> > Does anyone have a good example config on how to
> set
> > this up? I have two
> > onboard PVDM2 32 channel modules in my 2821. I
> want
> > the local router to
> > hit the gateway first for MTP, Conference and
> > Transcoding. Then CCM
> > 4.1.3. I have the Cisco procedure but I'm
> wondering
> > if I really need to
> > configure everything they are suggesting. Looks
> like
> > it might require
> > multiple dspfarm profiles for all the services I
> > want to provide.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Jason Wydra
> >
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This e-mail and its contents are subject to the
> Telkom SA Limited
> e-mail legal notice available at
> http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list