[cisco-voip] Unity/Exchange User Question

[Ed Leatherman]

I believe for this we had a TAC initiated call in to microsoft support to
get this working- so we always assumed it was supported. I can't understand
why this isnt just part of standard docs for setting it up on CCO - seems
like something that would be a common request.

On 8/15/06, Turpin, Mark <mark.turpin at bryancave.com> wrote:
>
>   By the way, I've gotten in to a very long "discussion" with TAC &
> AM/SE-related folks as to whether or not this is supported.
>
>
>
> We finally got a message of support, but it took a long time to get it
> through to them that this would work….
>
>
>
> -Mark
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ed Leatherman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:31 AM
>
> *To:* Israel Lang
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Unity/Exchange User Question
>
>
>
> Israel,
>
> The technet article our guys used was
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/guides/DROpsGuide/c546887c-fc65-44be-9b5e-8206272194b5.mspx?pf=true
>
>
> You are basically going to the users exchange advanced tab, clicking on
> mailbox rights, and granting the SELF account associated external account
> rights. One user at a time unless you script it.
>
> The exchange hotfix I mentioned in the previous message you have to call
> microsoft to get. He said it was no hassle, you just have to reference the
> KB article. 1800microsoft.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Ed
>
> On 8/15/06, *Israel Lang* <zephy316 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We have a number of departments that use CM and Unity VM-Only for their
> telephony needs. However, they are on their own domains and for all intents
> and purposes networks sans their phones. We recently got audited and one of
> the concerns was these departments that had accounts that either had
> passwords that didn't expire, passwords that hadn't been changed in a long
> time, and/or accounts that hadn't logged into the system in months.
>
> My question is how do others handle users that only need exchange/network
> accounts only for the purpose of VM?
>
> I have disabled some accounts in the past and have had mixed results at
> best with the Unity Accounts working after doing so. Perhaps, I am just not
> following the right procedure at all times to do this.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> --
> Have a great day!!!!!!!!!!
> zephy316_gmail.com
>
> Replace the _ with an @ symbol
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
> Senior Voice Engineer
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network Operations
>
> This electronic message is from a law firm. It may contain confidential or
> privileged information. If you received this transmission in error, please
> reply to the sender to advise of the error and delete this transmission and
> any attachments.
>
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements
> imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
> contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
> or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
> penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or
> recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>



-- 
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060815/d312e73c/attachment.html