[cisco-voip] Thoughts on 5.X CCM

[Jonathan Charles]

That's funny.

That exact same bug was in OS 2000.2.7 for the Windows version for the HP
servers.



Jonathan

On 12/6/06, Bernhard Albler <balbler at nts.at> wrote:
>
>  Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I have two implementations of CCM 5.0(4) and IPCC-X 4.5 (both ipcc-x
> premium)
>
> Worked pretty fine, no issues with IPCC-X so far. CCM has a few bugs. Some
> smaller some larger. There is something a bit annoying with regard to CTI
> with 5.0(4): CTI Callrequests (from agent desktop for example) will wait
> for a 20 second overlap dialing timeout. But that is fixed since ES 17 or
> so.
>
> If you happen to run 7825H1 Servers: very nasty bug there with the HP raid
> driver: IO Starvation spikes every 5 hours will sometimes cause the CCM
> Service to core dump. Ouch.
>
> Otherwise, call control is really quite stable on 5.0.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Bernhard
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------
>
> DI (FH) Bernhard Albler, NTS AG
>
> Tel.: +43 (316) 405 455 -0, email: balbler at nts.at
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *Von:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *Im Auftrag von *Voll, Scott
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 06. Dezember 2006 00:45
> *An:* Vince Loschiavo; Wydra, Jason; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Betreff:* Re: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on 5.X CCM
>
>
>
> In any of the implementations have they been using IPCCx or Unity.  If so,
> what versions.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Vince Loschiavo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:27 PM
> *To:* Wydra, Jason; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on 5.X CCM
>
>
>
> Yeah, I have a couple of 5.0(4) implementations.
>
>
>
> The call control and functionality of the phones is rock solid.
>
>
>
> The Admin Web page needs a little work....ran into a few bugs...but
> nothing major.
>
>
>
> I'm anxiously awaiting the 5.1 release...available on CCO next week.
> Hopefully they fixed those admin page bugs!  :P
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Wydra, Jason
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 05, 2006 6:22 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Thoughts on 5.X CCM
>
> I'm curious how much 5.X is being deployed. I haven't heard too much buzz
> about it. Is it because it's unstable, scary, unappealing or what? I'm
> trying to get an idea before I start recommending it or building it in my
> lab. Any war stories? Most of the deployments I see today are 4.1.3because it's a trusted/stable version. Is
> 5.X still too immature even though it's been available for some time?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jason Wydra
>
> Berbee
>
> Cisco Voice Engineer
>
> 8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700
>
> Chicago, Il. 60631
>
> IP phone 773.867.6084
>
> Cell 630-209-9792
>
> Jason.Wydra at berbee.com
>
> www.berbee.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061206/74f5b922/attachment.html