[cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?
Vince Loschiavo
vloschiavo at data-corporation.com
Thu Dec 14 01:45:07 EST 2006
Using 4.2 cluster.
No problems. Rock solid, and a couple of new features.
Also using 5.0(4). Even more features. But I'd only give it a 9 out of 10 because of the web admin interface. It still needs a little work.
Regards,
Vince Loschiavo
Senior Cisco Engineer
DATACORP
7862821164
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra at berbee.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:50:16
To:<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?
Hello all. I may have to move from 4.1(3) up to 4.2(1) or 4.2(3) in order to get support for MGCP T1 CAS hookflash on my 3845. As it stands hookflash on a T1 CAS only seems to be supported on a 6608 blade prior to 4.2.
I would be curious to hear of any war stories from the field regarding stability, functionality, bugginess, etc….. I’m not sure if 4.2(1)sr1b is a better bet or if 4.2(3) is. 4.2(3) seems a little too new. Any advice would be appreciated. I haven’t had any experience with 4.2 and I would hate to push my client into a messy platform.
Regards,
Jason Wydra
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list