[cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?

[Mike Mike]

We are running 4.2(1)sr1.  This weekend we are either going to apply sr1b or
just go to 4.2(3)

On 12/14/06, Vince Loschiavo <vloschiavo at data-corporation.com> wrote:
>
> Using 4.2 cluster.
> No problems. Rock solid, and a couple of new features.
>
> Also using 5.0(4). Even more features. But I'd only give it a 9 out of 10
> because of the web admin interface. It still needs a little work.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vince Loschiavo
> Senior Cisco Engineer
> DATACORP
> 7862821164
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra at berbee.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:50:16
> To:<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?
>
> Hello all. I may have to move from 4.1(3) up to 4.2(1) or 4.2(3) in order
> to get support for MGCP T1 CAS hookflash on my 3845. As it stands hookflash
> on a T1 CAS only seems to be supported on a 6608 blade prior to 4.2.
>
>
>
> I would be curious to hear of any war stories from the field regarding
> stability, functionality, bugginess, etc….. I'm not sure if 4.2(1)sr1b is
> a better bet or if 4.2(3) is. 4.2(3) seems a little too new. Any advice
> would be appreciated. I haven't had any experience with 4.2 and I would
> hate to push my client into a messy platform.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Jason Wydra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061214/4c784ccc/attachment.html