[cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?

[Jonathan Charles]

No idea.

However, a gateway with a CUE with a CCM integration can use MGCP (to
connect to CCM) and SIP (to connect to CUE), so it looks like multiple
protocols are supported.

Also, the IPtoIP gateway supports multiple protocols as well, SIP, H.323,
etc...



Jonathan

On 12/15/06, Wydra, Jason <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:
>
>  Do you know if it's a supported config? This is going to go on a
> production gateway.
>
>
>
> Jason Wydra
>
> Berbee
>
> Cisco Voice Engineer
>
> 8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700
>
> Chicago, Il. 60631
>
> IP phone 773.867.6084
>
> Cell 630-209-9792
>
> Jason.Wydra at berbee.com
>
> www.berbee.com
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2006 10:27 AM
> *To:* Wydra, Jason
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?
>
>
>
> That should work, as long as the interface isn't under MGCP control, you
> should be okay to run H.323 on it.
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 12/15/06, *Wydra, Jason *<jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:
>
> I'm going to try it and I will post the results.
>
>
>
> Jason Wydra
>
> Berbee
>
> Cisco Voice Engineer
>
> 8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700
>
> Chicago , Il. 60631
>
> IP phone 773.867.6084
>
> Cell 630-209-9792
>
> Jason.Wydra at berbee.com
>
> www.berbee.com
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonvoip at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2006 9:48 AM
> *To:* Wydra, Jason
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?
>
>
>
> However,
>
> Theoretically, if you had H.323 dial-peers (without the service mgcp),
> they should match any H.323 calls that hit the gateway.
>
> So, if you created two different route-lists one for MGCP and one for
> H.323 and sent calls to the same gateway, they both should work.
>
>
> HOWEVER,
>
> If the controller T1 says service mgcp after the timeslots command, there
> is a high probability that H.323 will NOT work (as the circuit is being
> controlled by CCM).
>
> What could work is if you had a PRI and a T1 CAS and controlled the PRI
> via MGCP and the T1 CAS via H.323...
>
> But I would need to see it actually doing stuff before believing it would
> work...
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 12/15/06, *Jonathan Charles* <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, I guess that wouldn't be 'simultaneously...'
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> On 12/15/06, *Jonathan Charles* <jonvoip at gmail.com > wrote:
>
> I have done it.
>
> Configured both and set the H.323 as a second choice on the route list,
> and then killed MGCP, calls still worked fine.
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 12/15/06, *Wydra, Jason* <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:
>
>   Can you? I guess the better question is if it's supported.
>
>
>
> Jason Wydra
>
> Berbee
>
> Cisco Voice Engineer
>
> 8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700
>
> Chicago, Il . 60631
>
> IP phone 773.867.6084
>
> Cell 630-209-9792
>
> Jason.Wydra at berbee.com
>
> www.berbee.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061215/1434857b/attachment.html