[cisco-voip] h323 and outgoing subnet mask

[Uben Pharten]

James,

Are you trying to specify the calling mask on the Gateway only? You might
have better luck using route-groups and route-patterns like Ryan mentioned.
This provides more flexibility in digit manipulations.

Uben - CCNA


On 2/16/06, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> To have the mask applied you need to have the "Use Calling Party's
> External Phone Number Mask" set on the route pattern/route group
> details AND have the mask configured on the calling line.  There is
> no difference between H.323 and MGCP as far as CM is concerned.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 1:30 PM, James Grace wrote:
>
> I need to know how outgoing mask for caller id works for h323 gws.
> We have a few sites around the us and they all use one h323 gw for LD
> calls.  We tried to put outgoing mask on the line config and this do
> not work.  If we put the mask on the gw config its fine.   But this
> way caller id is screwed because you can only put one mask #.  Is
> there a limitation with this by configuring  h323 gws.  Mgcp works
> fine.  But the vendor needs it to be h323
>
>
>
> James D. Grace
>
> CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
>
> Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.
>
> Digitel Corporation
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060216/e5fd05bf/attachment.html