[cisco-voip] Describe CM server user license

Philip Walenta pwalenta at wi.rr.com
Wed Jan 25 14:36:29 EST 2006 

It should be added, that in future versions of CallManager, actual license
count versus phones registered will truly limit you to what you've purchased
in phone licenses. 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 1:29 PM
To: Aaron J. Clary
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Describe CM server user license

Server license is basically how many endpoints you are allowed to register
to that server.  The 100 user license for 7815 is both a marketing point and
a technical point because it is a very weak server than cannot support the
full suite of CM services (IPMA, CTI Control, AC, IPCC Express, 100 phone
endpoints with 6 lines per endpoint, etc.) enabled and pounding that low end
server.

if you need a larger server or more capacity please work with your cisco
account teams.  There is usually favorable pricing available for platform
(and therefore server user license) upgrades.

/Wes

Aaron J. Clary wrote:
> Would someone be able to explain to me what CM server user license is?
> How does one upgrade the software? I have a CM with 100 server user 
> licenses on a 7815.
>
> Thanks in advance so much
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 10:06 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 35, Issue 136
>
> Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
> 	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. CORRECTION RE: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003 SP2 (Voll, Scott)
>    2. RE: TAPs and shared lines (Ortiz, Carlos)
>    3. RE: Can I install 4.0(2) in MCS7825  (Voll, Scott)
>    4. RE: Valid places to configure MOH (Voll, Scott)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:43:43 -0800
> From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
> Subject: CORRECTION RE: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003 SP2
> To: "Martin Lohnert" <lohnert at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01BE101F at VISHNU.wesd.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Thanks Martin.  I meant Exchange 2003 sp 2.
>
>  
>
> Scott
>
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Martin Lohnert [mailto:lohnert at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:00 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows 2003 SP2
>
>  
>
> HI Scott,
>
> Where did you find out about W2003 SP2? I don't think there is such a 
> beast yet :) Or do you mean Windows 2003 R2 ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> ML
>
>  
>
> On 1/23/06, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll at wesd.org> wrote: 
>
> Is Windows 2003 SP2 approved for UM Unity 4.0.5?
>
>  
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>  
>
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060125/7e6e
> 22
> 92/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0500
> From: "Ortiz, Carlos" <CORTIZ at broward.org>
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] TAPs and shared lines
> To: "Ruttman, Peter G." <PRuttman at foley.com>,
> 	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	
> <26B357EF9FB7D04A989C9E82A9E5436E01367E07 at MREXVS01.bc.broward.cty>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>  
> We use taps to set up all the phones with the unique number (DN) on 
> each phone.  Then we set up shared lines manually.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Ruttman, Peter G.
> Sent: Wed 1/25/2006 10:06 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] TAPs and shared lines
>
>
>
> I read on the cisco discussion forum that TAPS does not support 
> auto-registering phones that have shared lines.  We have a lot of 
> attorney's that share lines with there legal assistants.  Will TAPS 
> fail in this environment?
>
> Also, does anyone have any documentation on how to use TAPS with Cisco 
> Extended Services rather then CRS?
>
> Pete
>
>
> The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the 
> attorney-client privilege. It is not intended for transmission to, or 
> receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this 
> message in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender 
> that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the
message.
> Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the 
> benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP client(s) represented by the Firm 
> in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may 
> not be relied upon by any other party.
>
>
> Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of 
> written advice include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding 
> message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless 
> expressly stated otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be 
> used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer, 
> for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax penalties, and was not written 
> to support the promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter
discussed herein.
>
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060125/28a2
> 00
> f0/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:58:38 -0800
> From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Can I install 4.0(2) in MCS7825
> To: "ALI Rijas Mannanthara" <RAli at covansys.com>,
> 	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01BE1020 at VISHNU.wesd.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> IMHO you just need to get rid of those ICS blades and get yourself a 
> 7825.  buy an hp if necessary but get rid of the ICD ASAP.  The ICD's 
> have not been supported since last march.  No new OS upgrades etc.
>
>  
>
> Scott
>
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ALI Rijas 
> Mannanthara
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:39 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Can I install 4.0(2) in MCS7825
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Hi All,
>
> My subscriber (ICS7750) and PUB (MCS7825) are running 3.3(3) .
>
> I need to upgrade with out replacing the hardware. So cisco Tells only 
> option is to go for 4.0(2) in ICS and I should also go to the same 
> version in my PUB but for that Cisco tells it is not recommended.
>
> Has any one  installed 4.0(2) in ICS 7825 ? .... All these came up we 
> got 10 7936 which is not supported by CCM 3.3(3)
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/ccmcomp
> .h
> tm
> <http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/ccmcomp.
> htm> 
>
>  
>
> ALI Rijas
>
> Systems-Network
>
> EPBX-+91-44-22623880 Extn :6226
>
> VoIP - 248-994-4858
>
> Covansys India Pvt.Ltd
>
> Confidentiality Statement:
>
> This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it 
> is addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information 
> which is exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not 
> the intended recipient, please note that you are strictly prohibited 
> from disseminating or distributing this information (other than to the 
> intended recipient) or copying this information. If you have received 
> this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return 
> email.
>
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060125/3bd1
> d6
> 76/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:05:57 -0800
> From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Valid places to configure MOH
> To: "Tim Reimers" <tim.reimers at asheville.k12.nc.us>,
> 	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01BE1022 at VISHNU.wesd.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Tim-
>
>  
>
> I'm not sure about 4.0 but with 4.1 you can use the bat tool to remove 
> MoH on both the line and phone.  Then you setup the Device pool to be 
> the global parameter.
>
>  
>
> Scott
>
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Reimers
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:23 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Valid places to configure MOH
>
>  
>
> hi guys-
>
> What are the valid places to configure MOH? 
> (in 4.01)
>
> I know it's done on phones and lines on phones--
>
> Is it possible to do this on CSS or Partition, or some other more 
> 'global' setting?
>
> If not, all my phones/lines are set to using "2- All in the Mind" 
>
> I'd like to globally switch that to "51- Fixed Audio" 
>
> I saw smoeone discussing SQL queries to find route patterns and change 
> them...
>
> is there a way to use SQL to find and modify all the MOH settings on a 
> group of phones at one time?
>
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060125/7275
> 63
> 95/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 35, Issue 136
> *******************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

More information about the cisco-voip mailing list